<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045</id><updated>2011-07-30T15:30:59.244-04:00</updated><category term='extremists'/><category term='liberal'/><category term='five pillars'/><category term='job loss'/><category term='accountability'/><category term='protesters'/><category term='Global Warming'/><category term='Holy Spirit'/><category term='abortion'/><category term='GM'/><category term='human rights'/><category term='Nancy Pelosi'/><category term='bi-partisan'/><category term='Patriotism'/><category term='George Bush'/><category term='academia'/><category term='truth'/><category term='cost'/><category term='taxes'/><category term='Barney Frank'/><category term='savings'/><category term='Thomas Hobbes'/><category term='Bible'/><category term='religious beliefs'/><category term='spending'/><category term='lies'/><category term='anger'/><category term='Pay-offs'/><category term='ethics lobbyist defense tobacco'/><category term='authoritarianism'/><category term='WSJ'/><category term='TARP'/><category term='cars'/><category term='disconnect'/><category term='fraud'/><category term='Chicago crooks'/><category term='homosexual agenda'/><category term='socialism'/><category term='torture'/><category term='reality'/><category term='secrets'/><category term='conscience'/><category term='economy'/><category term='Freddie Mac'/><category term='Private Enterprise'/><category term='policy'/><category term='flip-flop'/><category term='Specter'/><category term='Creationism'/><category term='treasury'/><category term='bankruptcy'/><category term='Chris Dodd'/><category term='guarantee'/><category term='Tariff'/><category term='Emanuel DeLauro taxes Chicago crooks'/><category term='transparency'/><category term='partisan'/><category term='judicial activism'/><category term='Deism'/><category term='statistics'/><category term='Barack Obama'/><category term='character'/><category term='Satan'/><category term='corruption'/><category term='president'/><category term='mis-representation'/><category term='Tiger Woods'/><category term='bureaucracy'/><category term='Janet Napolitano'/><category term='Peggy Noonan'/><category term='Harvard'/><category term='mainstream media'/><category term='Levin'/><category term='contracts'/><category term='Thomas'/><category term='Czar'/><category term='freedom of speech'/><category term='Iowa'/><category term='federal police force'/><category term='marriage'/><category term='Trinity'/><category term='honesty'/><category term='Fannie Mae'/><category term='evolution'/><category term='conservative'/><category term='exorcism'/><category term='fairness doctrine'/><category term='Pew'/><category term='Protectionism'/><category term='health socialism government control'/><category term='first amendment'/><category term='Cal Thomas'/><category term='gifts'/><category term='extremism'/><category term='22 weeks'/><category term='stanley fish'/><category term='Chrysler'/><category term='coronation'/><category term='biology'/><category term='president politics election'/><category term='internet'/><category term='hoax'/><category term='Obama'/><category term='government control'/><category term='Schaeffer'/><category term='Law'/><category term='assumptions'/><category term='empathy'/><category term='health-care'/><category term='science'/><category term='Rick Warren'/><category term='worry'/><category term='The Economist'/><category term='knowledge'/><category term='Celtic Woman'/><category term='diversity'/><category term='culture wars'/><category term='Medicare'/><category term='TEA party'/><category term='Geithner'/><category term='politics'/><category term='culture'/><category term='principles'/><category term='green jobs'/><category term='theater'/><category term='racial quotas'/><category term='terrorism'/><category term='Supreme Court'/><category term='Pay Cuts'/><category term='Porter Goss'/><category term='Leonard Weinstein'/><category term='terrorists'/><category term='Texas'/><category term='Shelby Steele'/><category term='messiah'/><category term='Jimmy Carter'/><category term='homeland security'/><category term='Cass Sunstein'/><category term='Charles Krauthammer'/><category term='Rush Limbaugh'/><category term='physicians'/><category term='rookie'/><category term='Dick Armey'/><category term='Thomas Sowell'/><category term='political correctness'/><category term='Harry Reid'/><category term='Obama-worship'/><category term='Christianity'/><category term='Wall Street'/><category term='Hillary Clinton'/><category term='crooks politicians whores'/><category term='national security'/><category term='jobs saved'/><category term='health'/><category term='right to Life'/><title type='text'>What Were You Thinking?</title><subtitle type='html'>I hope to express some thoughts regarding our society, politics, and the Obama administration, and perhaps even to conduct a reasonable conversation with those of other political persuasions.</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default?start-index=101&amp;max-results=100'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>176</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-6511888076960654210</id><published>2010-09-16T11:39:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2010-09-16T13:05:08.871-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Barack Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='policy'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='principles'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='socialism'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Private Enterprise'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='politics'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='disconnect'/><title type='text'>How Obama Thinks (Forbes Magazine)</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;From &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2010/0927/politics-socialism-capitalism-private-enterprises-obama-business-problem.html"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Forbes Magazine&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; comes &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2010/0927/politics-socialism-capitalism-private-enterprises-obama-business-problem.html"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;this insightful analysis&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; of the policies of Barack Hussein Obama, by Dinesh D'Souza.  A couple of paragraphs will give you the flavor, but read the entire article.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px; "&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Barack Obama is the most antibusiness president in a generation, perhaps in American history. Thanks to him the era of big government is back. Obama runs up taxpayer debt not in the billions but in the trillions. He has expanded the federal government's control over home mortgages, investment banking, health care, autos and energy. The &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Weekly Standard&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;summarizes Obama's approach as omnipotence at home, impotence abroad.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px; font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; "&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px; font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; "&gt;Theories abound to explain the President's goals and actions. Critics in the business community--including some Obama voters who now have buyer's remorse--tend to focus on two main themes. The first is that Obama is clueless about business. The second is that Obama is a socialist--not an out-and-out Marxist, but something of a European-style socialist, with a penchant for leveling and government redistribution.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px; font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; "&gt;These theories aren't wrong so much as they are inadequate. Even if they could account for Obama's domestic policy, they cannot explain his foreign policy. The real problem with Obama is worse--much worse. But we have been blinded to his real agenda because, across the political spectrum, we all seek to fit him into some version of American history. In the process, we ignore Obama's own history.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px; font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; "&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px; font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; "&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;It may seem incredible to suggest that the anticolonial ideology of Barack Obama Sr. is espoused by his son, the President of the United States. That is what I am saying. From a very young age and through his formative years, Obama learned to see America as a force for global domination and destruction. He came to view America's military as an instrument of neocolonial occupation. He adopted his father's position that capitalism and free markets are code words for economic plunder. Obama grew to perceive the rich as an oppressive class, a kind of neocolonial power within America. In his worldview, profits are a measure of how effectively you have ripped off the rest of society, and America's power in the world is a measure of how selfishly it consumes the globe's resources and how ruthlessly it bullies and dominates the rest of the planet.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px; font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; "&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Rejecting the socialist formula, Obama has shown no intention to nationalize the investment banks or the health sector. Rather, he seeks to decolonize these institutions, and this means bringing them under the government's leash. That's why Obama retains the right to refuse bailout paybacks--so that he can maintain his control. For Obama, health insurance companies on their own are oppressive racketeers, but once they submitted to federal oversight he was happy to do business with them. He even promised them expanded business as a result of his law forcing every American to buy health insurance.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px; font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; "&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Obama supports the Ground Zero mosque because to him 9/11 is the event that unleashed the American bogey and pushed us into Iraq and Afghanistan. He views some of the Muslims who are fighting against America abroad as resisters of U.S. imperialism. Certainly that is the way the Lockerbie bomber Abdel Baset al-Megrahi portrayed himself at his trial. Obama's perception of him as an anticolonial resister would explain why he gave tacit approval for this murderer of hundreds of Americans to be released from captivity.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px; font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; "&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Clearly the anticolonial ideology of Barack Obama Sr. goes a long way to explain the actions and policies of his son in the Oval Office. And we can be doubly sure about his father's influence because those who know Obama well testify to it. His "granny" Sarah Obama (not his real grandmother but one of his grandfather's other wives) told &lt;i&gt;Newsweek&lt;/i&gt;, "I look at him and I see all the same things--he has taken everything from his father. The son is realizing everything the father wanted. The dreams of the father are still alive in the son."&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px; font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; "&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;In his own writings Obama stresses the centrality of his father not only to his beliefs and values but to his very identity. He calls his memoir "the record of a personal, interior journey--a boy's search for his father and through that search a workable meaning for his life as a black American." And again, "It was into my father's image, the black man, son of Africa, that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in myself." Even though his father was absent for virtually all his life, Obama writes, "My father's voice had nevertheless remained untainted, inspiring, rebuking, granting or withholding approval. You do not work hard enough, Barry. You must help in your people's struggle. Wake up, black man!"&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px; font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; "&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Colonialism today is a dead issue. No one cares about it except the man in the White House. He is the last anticolonial. Emerging market economies such as China, India, Chile and Indonesia have solved the problem of backwardness; they are exploiting their labor advantage and growing much faster than the U.S. If America is going to remain on top, we have to compete in an increasingly tough environment.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px; font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; "&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;But instead of readying us for the challenge, our President is trapped in his father's time machine. Incredibly, the U.S. is being ruled according to the dreams of a Luo tribesman of the 1950s. This philandering, inebriated African socialist, who raged against the world for denying him the realization of his anticolonial ambitions, is now setting the nation's agenda through the reincarnation of his dreams in his son. The son makes it happen, but he candidly admits he is only living out his father's dream. The invisible father provides the inspiration, and the son dutifully gets the job done. America today is governed by a ghost.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px; font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; "&gt;&lt;i&gt;Dinesh D'Souza is president of the King's College in New York City&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px; font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; "&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px; font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; "&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You Thinking?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 22px; font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; "&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px; "&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-6511888076960654210?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6511888076960654210'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6511888076960654210'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2010/09/how-obama-thinks-forbes-magazine.html' title='How Obama Thinks (Forbes Magazine)'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-5148847379830967878</id><published>2010-08-30T14:40:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2010-08-30T14:46:34.019-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Who is this guy?</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.peggynoonan.com/article.php?article=537"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Peggy Noonan&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; raises the questions that most Americans have already been pondering in their own minds for the past couple of years.  A quote from her column, dated August 27, 2010:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;When the American people have looked at the presidents of the past few decades they could always sort of say, "I know that guy." Bill Clinton: Southern governor. Good ol' boy, drawlin', flirtin', got himself a Fulbright. "I know that guy." George W. Bush: Texan, little rough around the edges, good family, youthful high jinks, stopped drinking, got serious. "I know that guy." Ronald Reagan was harder to peg, but you still knew him: small-town Midwesterner, moved on and up, serious about politics, humorous, patriotic. "I know that guy." Barack Obama? Sleek, cerebral, detached, an academic from Chicago by way of Hawaii and Indonesia. "You know what? I don't know that guy!"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Who among us can say that they really have an understanding of who he is, what he thinks, where he comes from?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-5148847379830967878?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5148847379830967878'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5148847379830967878'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2010/08/who-is-this-guy.html' title='Who is this guy?'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-956294573257165223</id><published>2010-03-16T12:32:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2010-03-16T12:35:49.782-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Barack Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='reality'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='truth'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='transparency'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='accountability'/><title type='text'>Transparency? You decide...</title><content type='html'>&lt;object width="660" height="405"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QdKmc9aBELM&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;amp;border=1"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QdKmc9aBELM&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="660" height="405"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-956294573257165223?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/956294573257165223'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/956294573257165223'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2010/03/transparency-you-decide.html' title='Transparency? You decide...'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-6726283455946524905</id><published>2010-02-17T10:53:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-17T11:00:09.698-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='bankruptcy'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Medicare'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Barack Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='job loss'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='economy'/><title type='text'>The Failure of Liberal Governance</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;From the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704804204575069520491303964.html?mod=rss_opinion_main"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Wall Street Journal today&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;To fix the economy, Democrats sent federal spending to peacetime heights in the name of replacing private investment with "public demand." But instead of spurring recovery, this spending spree has retarded it by frightening the public and business about future tax increases and the rising burden of public debt. The new jobs Democrats promised still haven't arrived, and while the recovery should finally produce job growth this year, Americans know they have received little for their $862 billion in "stimulus."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;The rest of Mr. Obama's liberal agenda has foundered on its own overreaching implausibility. To fight the speculative threat of global warming, Democrats have tried to impose vast new taxes to raise energy prices. To address rising health-care costs, they proposed huge new health subsidies and political control of medical decisions. Medicare is heading toward bankruptcy, yet Mr. Obama's response is to make the entire health-care system like Medicare. And to fix the financial system, they have declared war on bankers while proposing reforms that would do little to prevent future bank bailouts.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704804204575069520491303964.html?mod=rss_opinion_main"&gt;Read the entire article here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-6726283455946524905?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6726283455946524905'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6726283455946524905'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2010/02/failure-of-liberal-governance.html' title='The Failure of Liberal Governance'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-2790350626338388995</id><published>2010-02-09T11:20:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-09T11:21:40.378-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Patriotism'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Celtic Woman'/><title type='text'>Awaken, O America</title><content type='html'>&lt;object width="660" height="525"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2fzKY0hS_Pw&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;amp;border=1"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2fzKY0hS_Pw&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="660" height="525"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-2790350626338388995?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2790350626338388995'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2790350626338388995'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2010/02/awaken-o-america.html' title='Awaken, O America'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-5744637740546287598</id><published>2010-01-18T12:28:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2010-01-18T12:35:40.072-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='WSJ'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Barack Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='policy'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Peggy Noonan'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='politics'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='disconnect'/><title type='text'>The Obama Disconnect</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Peggy Noonan points out the disconnect between our current president and the people of the country.  It's not just a rhetorical disconnect, not just an iconic disconnect.  No, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 19px; "&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; these reflect a deeper disconnect, the truly problematic one, and that is over policy.  &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704281204575003433828439728.html?mod=rss_opinion_main"&gt;Read the article here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small; line-height: 19px;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small; line-height: 19px;"&gt;"&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/a&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-5744637740546287598?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5744637740546287598'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5744637740546287598'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2010/01/obama-disconnect.html' title='The Obama Disconnect'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-5888199889526519651</id><published>2010-01-04T08:42:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-01-04T08:48:57.415-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='extremists'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='extremism'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='WSJ'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='terrorism'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='terrorists'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='national security'/><title type='text'>Criminal Activity or Terrorism</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704065404574636130361837754.html?mod=rss_opinion_main"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;L. Gordon Crovitz' article&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; in today's Wall Street Journal points out the fallacy of treating suspects in the war on Terror the same way we would treat potential terrorists.  The Obama administration has taken us back to the pre-911 days of the Clinton administration, and is making it easier, not harder, for those who hate our country to plot and conduct their murderous mayhem.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-5888199889526519651?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5888199889526519651'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5888199889526519651'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2010/01/criminal-activity-or-terrorism.html' title='Criminal Activity or Terrorism'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-3767110240905592948</id><published>2009-12-31T10:05:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-31T10:13:49.673-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Shelby Steele'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Obama-worship'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Barack Obama'/><title type='text'>Obama and Post-Modern Rascism</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;A &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704254604574614540488450188.html?mod=djemEditorialPage"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;thoughtful article&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; yesterday by Shelby Steele in the Wall Street Journal suggests that the Emperor has no clothes.  Steele says:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;I think that Mr. Obama is not just inexperienced; he is also hampered by a distinct inner emptiness - not an emptiness that comes from stupidity or a lack of ability but an emptiness that has been actually nurtured and developed as an adaptation to the political world. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;The nature of this emptiness becomes clear in the contrast between him and Ronald Reagan. Reagan reached the White House through a great deal of what is called "individuating" - that is he took principled positions throughout his long career that jeopardized his popularity, and in so doing he came to know who he was as a man and what he truly believed. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;He became Ronald Reagan through dissent, not conformity. And when he was finally elected president, it was because America at last wanted the vision that he had evolved over a lifetime of challenging conventional wisdom. By the time Reagan became president, he had fought his way to a remarkable certainty about who he was, what he believed, and where he wanted to lead the nation.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Mr. Obama's ascendancy to the presidency could not have been more different. There seems to have been very little individuation, no real argument with conventional wisdom, and no willingness to jeopardize popularity for principle. To the contrary, he has come forward in American politics by emptying himself of strong convictions, by rejecting principled stands as "ideological," and by promising to deliver us from the "tired" culture-war debates of the past. He aspires to be "post-ideological," "post-racial" and "post-partisan," which is to say that he defines himself by a series of "nots" - thus implying that being nothing is better than being something. He tries to make a politics out of emptiness itself.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;"&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/a&gt;?"&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-3767110240905592948?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/3767110240905592948'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/3767110240905592948'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/12/obama-and-post-modern-rascism.html' title='Obama and Post-Modern Rascism'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-5942923971302072126</id><published>2009-12-29T10:32:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-29T10:43:53.567-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='terrorism'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='terrorists'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Janet Napolitano'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='bureaucracy'/><title type='text'>Smarter Security, not More Money</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.heritage.org/"&gt;The Heritage Foundation&lt;/a&gt; published &lt;a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/29/morning-bell-terrorism-threat-demands-smarter-security-not-more-money/"&gt;an article this morning&lt;/a&gt; regarding how our bloated Federal bureaucracy is responding to the recent foiled terror attack.  &lt;a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/29/morning-bell-terrorism-threat-demands-smarter-security-not-more-money/"&gt;Read the article&lt;/a&gt;; here's a tidbit from it:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"The Flight 253 attack was the 28th foiled terror plot against the United States since 9/11. What is notable is that of the 28 failed plots, 26 were stopped by intelligence, military, and law enforcement agencies. Only two were stopped by citizens on the scene - Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab in 2009, and Richard Reid in 2001. In both these cases, America just got lucky - the plots were clumsy and the passengers and crew responded bravely and quickly. There are many valuable lessons to be learned from the failed Christmas attack on a Detroit-bound airliner; throwing more money at airline security is not one of them."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/a&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-5942923971302072126?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5942923971302072126'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5942923971302072126'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/12/smarter-security-not-more-money.html' title='Smarter Security, not More Money'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-7093351038846029306</id><published>2009-12-21T16:39:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-21T16:53:35.582-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Obama-worship'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='hoax'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Barack Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='honesty'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tiger Woods'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fraud'/><title type='text'>Tiger and Barack</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Lisa Schiffren wrote an article on the American Thinker back on December 8 titled "&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/12/tiger_barrack_and_the_law_of_t.html"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Tiger, Barack, and the Law of Transitivity&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;." It's quite interesting in its premise: the squeaky-clean image of Tiger Woods was a creation of businesses interested in extracting money from the public, and is very similar to the image created for Barack Obama leading up to the election of 2008.  In both cases the image that was created, and widely believed, was significantly different from the personal reality of the individual.  Give it a read.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"If I were watching the public's disgust with the newly revealed Tiger Woods from an office in the West Wing, I'd be concerned. Because Barack Obama is about as completely manufactured a political character as this nation has seen. His meteoric rise, without the inconvenience of a public record or accomplishments, and the public's willing suspension of critical evaluation of his résumé allowed his handlers and the media to project whatever they wanted to on his unfurrowed brow."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-7093351038846029306?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7093351038846029306'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7093351038846029306'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/12/tiger-and-barack.html' title='Tiger and Barack'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-6770536522945729586</id><published>2009-12-21T08:32:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-21T08:46:45.902-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Hentoff: America under Obama</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;John Whitehead of the Rutherford Institute conducts an &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rutherford.org/Oldspeak/Articles/Interviews/oldspeak-Hentoff_2009.html"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;interview with Nat Hentoff&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;, of whom Whitehead says, "&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 16px; "&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;he has angered nearly every political faction and remains one of a few who has stuck to his principles through his many years of work, regardless of the trouble it stirred up.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Hentoff speaks to many of the issues of the day, including government health care, unemployment, public education, and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;the Fourth Amendment&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-6770536522945729586?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6770536522945729586'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6770536522945729586'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/12/hentoff-america-under-obama.html' title='Hentoff: America under Obama'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-4745708836598471166</id><published>2009-12-09T17:28:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-09T21:41:38.491-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Cal Thomas'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Global Warming'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Leonard Weinstein'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fraud'/><title type='text'>An Overdue Debunking</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Cal Thomas's column in today's paper carried the title indicated above.  In the archives, it's titled "The Flathead Society."  Either way, if you have an interest in joining the debate over global warming you would do well to &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/thomas120809.php3"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;give it a read&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Cal cites an&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/disproving-the-anthropogenic-global-warming-agw-problem/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; essay by Dr. Leonard Weinstein&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;, a NASA research scientist with over 30 years of experience.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-4745708836598471166?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/4745708836598471166'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/4745708836598471166'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/12/overdue-debunking.html' title='An Overdue Debunking'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-5677260817302377738</id><published>2009-12-08T15:20:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-08T15:24:59.284-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Harry Reid'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='socialism'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='spending'/><title type='text'>Attack on America Redux</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www1.ibdcd.com/image/toon_120709_C_FULL.gif" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-5677260817302377738?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5677260817302377738'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5677260817302377738'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/12/attack-on-america-redux.html' title='Attack on America Redux'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-8785255566039909604</id><published>2009-12-08T14:52:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-08T15:19:41.679-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='liberal'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Harry Reid'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='lies'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='health-care'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='mis-representation'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='health'/><title type='text'>American History, as mis-told by Harry Reid</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;There's no shortage of lunacy and outright lies coming from the left side of the political spectrum.  Senator Harry Reid (D-Nev) recently mis-represented the women's suffrage and emancipation movements as having been blocked by Republicans.  In fact, it was members of his own party that blocked and obstructed such advances.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703558004574583980985617954.html"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Read John Fund's story&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; in the Wall Street journal, setting the record straight.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-8785255566039909604?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/8785255566039909604'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/8785255566039909604'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/12/american-history-as-mis-told-by-harry.html' title='American History, as mis-told by Harry Reid'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-8275487934726811655</id><published>2009-12-06T08:50:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-12-06T08:53:25.009-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Mr Independant</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; line-height: 10px; "&gt;&lt;p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 8px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 8px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; line-height: 1.5em; display: block; "&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Mr. Lieberman notes that the public option serves no other purpose: "It doesn't help one poor person get insurance who doesn't have it now. It doesn't compel one insurance company to provide insurance to somebody who has an illness. And . . . it doesn't do anything to reduce the cost of insurance."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 8px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 8px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; line-height: 1.5em; display: block; "&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Mr. Lieberman dismisses Democratic arguments that it is necessary to keep insurers honest. "Sometimes the private sector does things that are wrong, and when they do, you regulate—sometimes you litigate," he says. "But never in the history of America . . . have we tried to keep one industry honest by having government go into that business to compete with the industry."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 8px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 8px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; line-height: 1.5em; display: block; "&gt;&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704007804574574652325364622.html?mod=rss_opinion_main"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Read Joe Lieberman's article&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; in the Wall Street Journal.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 8px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 8px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; line-height: 1.5em; display: block; "&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-8275487934726811655?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/8275487934726811655'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/8275487934726811655'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/12/mr-independant.html' title='Mr Independant'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-7736865104763250471</id><published>2009-11-27T11:22:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-27T11:22:52.344-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Lincoln's Thanksgiving Proclamation</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;A &lt;A  href="http://www.infoplease.com/spot/tgproclamation.html"&gt;message from Abraham  Lincoln&lt;/A&gt;, delivered&amp;nbsp;on October 3, 1863...&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;The year that is drawing toward its close has    been filled with the blessings of fruitful fields and healthful skies. To    these bounties, which are so constantly enjoyed that we are prone to forget    the source from which they come, others have been added which are of so    extraordinary a nature that they can not fail to penetrate and soften even the    heart which is habitually insensible to the ever-watchful providence of    Almighty God.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;In the midst of a civil war of unequaled    magnitude and severity, which has sometimes seemed to foreign states to invite    and to provoke their aggression, peace has been preserved with all nations,    order has been maintained, the laws have been respected and obeyed, and    harmony has prevailed everywhere, except in the theater of military conflict,    while that theater has been greatly contracted by the advancing armies and    navies of the Union.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Needful diversions of wealth and of strength from    the fields of peaceful industry to the national defense have not arrested the    plow, the shuttle, or the ship; the ax has enlarged the borders of our    settlements, and the mines, as well as the iron and coal as of our precious    metals, have yielded even more abundantly than heretofore. Population has    steadily increased notwithstanding the waste that has been made in the camp,    the siege, and the battlefield, and the country, rejoicing in the    consciousness of augmented strength and vigor, is permitted to expect    continuance of years with large increase of freedom.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;No human counsel hath devised nor hath any mortal    hand worked out these great things. They are the gracious gifts of the Most    High God, who, while dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath nevertheless    remembered mercy.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;It has seemed to me fit and proper that they    should be solemnly, reverently, and gratefully acknowledged, as with one heart    and one voice, by the whole American people. I do therefore invite my    fellow-citizens in every part of the United States, and also those who are in    foreign lands, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November next as    a day of thanksgiving and praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the    heavens. And I recommend to them that while offering up the ascriptions justly    due to Him for such singular deliverances and blessings they do also, with    humble penitence for our national perverseness and disobedience, commend to    His tender care all those who have become widows, orphans, mourners, or    sufferers in the lamentable civil strife in which we are unavoidably engaged,    and fervently implore the imposition of the Almighty hand to heal the wounds    of the nation and to restore it, as soon as may be consistent with the divine    purpose, to the full enjoyment of peace, harmony, tranquility, and    union.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;In testimony whereof I have hereunto set my hand    and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2    face=Arial&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;A far cry from the current  administration.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What  Were You Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-7736865104763250471?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7736865104763250471'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7736865104763250471'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/11/lincolns-thanksgiving-proclamation.html' title='Lincoln&apos;s Thanksgiving Proclamation'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-7893306080239796020</id><published>2009-11-19T09:19:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-19T09:34:53.319-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='terrorism'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='political correctness'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='diversity'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='politics'/><title type='text'>Mindless Mantra of "Diversity"</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=116476"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Read what Ann Coulter has to say about diversity&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; at WorldNetDaily.  Here's a blurb to whet your appetite:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"Never in recorded history has diversity been anything but a problem. Look at Ireland with its Protestant and Catholic populations, Canada with its French and English populations, Israel with its Jewish and Palestinian populations.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Or consider the warring factions in India, Sri Lanka, China, Iraq, Czechoslovakia (until it happily split up), the Balkans and Chechnya. Also look at the festering hotbeds of tribal warfare - I mean the beautiful mosaics - in Third World hellholes like Afghanistan, Rwanda and South Central L.A.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;'Diversity' is a difficulty to be overcome, not an advantage to be sought. True, America does a better job than most at accommodating a diverse population. We also do a better job at curing cancer and containing pollution. But no one goes around mindlessly exclaiming: 'Cancer is a strength!' 'Pollution is our greatest asset!' "&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-7893306080239796020?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7893306080239796020'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7893306080239796020'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/11/mindless-mantra-of-diversity.html' title='Mindless Mantra of &quot;Diversity&quot;'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-4154890167019373601</id><published>2009-11-13T10:10:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-13T10:13:46.545-05:00</updated><title type='text'>The Winds of Change</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/lb1111cd20091110044417.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-4154890167019373601?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/4154890167019373601'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/4154890167019373601'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/11/winds-of-change.html' title='The Winds of Change'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-5192810810242450438</id><published>2009-11-10T09:47:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-10T09:53:26.481-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Reagan's Role</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;This morning from the Heritage Foundation:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;On June 12, 1987, President Ronald Reagan stood at the Brandenburg Gate in West Berlin and said: "General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization: Come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;On November 9, 1989, just two years after Reagan made his Brandenburg Gate speech, the people of Germany did tear down "this wall" and in so doing they freed hundreds of millions of people from the tyranny of communism. Reagan by no means single-handily brought about the fall of the Berlin Wall, but his leadership against despotism was widely recognized by the victims of communism. When he visited Poland in 1990, a dissident leader presented Reagan with a sword explaining: "I am giving you this saber for helping us to chop off the head of communism."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;But the leftists in America do not want us to remember Reagan’s role in history. That is why President Barack Obama (the same man who found time to jet to Copenhagen at the drop of a rumor that his presence could win the Olympics for his hometown of Chicago) could not be bothered to attend the 20th anniversary of the wall’s fall last night. Instead, President Obama taped a video message that completely failed to mention Reagan or British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;More than petty partisan slights are at stake here. President Obama’s refusal to recognize the role President Reagan’s and Prime Minister Thatcher’s leadership played in defeating despotism goes to the core of Obama’s foreign policy priorities. Heritage scholar Nile Gardiner explains:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Barack Obama simply does not view the world as Reagan did, in terms of good versus evil, as a world divided between the forces of freedom on one side and totalitarianism on the other. For the Obama administration the advancement of human rights and individual liberty on the world stage is a distinctly low priority, as we have seen with its engagement strategy towards the likes of Iran, Burma, Sudan, Venezuela and Russia.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial; font-size: small; "&gt;We commemorate the fall of the Berlin Wall to celebrate the collapse of communism, to honor those who died resisting communism, and to resolve that never again will peoples and nations allow so evil a tyranny to terrorize the world.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Yet, at a time when the United States currently faces challenges as complicated as those confronted by Reagan (war in Afghanistan, the global fight against Islamist terrorism, the rise of a nuclear-armed Iran) Obama is bent on apologizing for our nation’s actions, betraying Cold War allies, and dithering on troop deployments.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/a&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-5192810810242450438?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5192810810242450438'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5192810810242450438'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/11/reagans-role.html' title='Reagan&apos;s Role'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-7193686345597113241</id><published>2009-11-09T16:40:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-09T17:19:21.631-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Nancy Pelosi'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='health-care'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='reality'/><title type='text'>November 7, 2009: a Day that will Live in Infamy</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;You can find &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.defendyourhealthcare.us./"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;a link to the text of H.R 3962&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;, the Pelosi health-care bill passed by the House of Representatives,  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.defendyourhealthcare.us./"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;HERE&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;.  You can read a short summary of what's in those 1,900+ pages, by &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704795604574519671055918380.html"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Betsy McCaughey at Wall Street Journal, HERE&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;If you think people ought to be thrown in jail for not buying insurance, you'll probably love the bill.  If you think old folks are getting off easy today, you'll love what's gonna happen to them when this bill goes into effect.  If you think that all the uninsured will get free health care, you're sadly mistaken.  If you think that you personally will benefit, you're probably wrong about that, too.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704402404574523613159447566.html"&gt;Every Medical Insurance Decision will be subject to Rationing by Politics!&lt;/a&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/a&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-7193686345597113241?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7193686345597113241'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7193686345597113241'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/11/november-7-2009-day-that-will-live-in.html' title='November 7, 2009: a Day that will Live in Infamy'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-6198380927171647509</id><published>2009-10-31T23:18:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-31T23:26:15.462-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='WSJ'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='government control'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='health-care'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='health'/><title type='text'>WSJ on ObamaCare</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;If you're the sort of person that wants to know what's going on in the debate over health-care reform, you might consider looking at &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704471504574441193211542788.html?mod=rss_opinion_main"&gt;this Wall Street Journal web page&lt;/a&gt;. They have links in one place on many (all?) of the articles they've published on this issue.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/a&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-6198380927171647509?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6198380927171647509'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6198380927171647509'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/10/wsj-on-obamacare.html' title='WSJ on ObamaCare'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-162406350729158813</id><published>2009-10-31T21:51:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-31T21:52:27.546-04:00</updated><title type='text'>'Obama Is Average'</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;The German news magazine &lt;EM&gt;'Der Spiegel'&lt;/EM&gt;  presents &lt;A  href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,656501,00.html"&gt;an  interview with noted conservative collumnist Charles Krauthammer&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp;  Here's a teaser where Dr. K offers an opinion of Obama's foreign  policy:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;SPIEGEL: You famously coined the term "Reagan    Doctrine" to describe Ronald Reagan's foreign policy. What is the "Obama    Doctrine?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Krauthammer: I would say his vision of the world    appears to me to be so naïve that I am not even sure he's able to develop a    doctrine. He has a view of the world as regulated by self-enforcing    international norms, where the peace is kept by some kind of vague    international consensus, something called the international community, which    to me is a fiction, acting through obviously inadequate and worthless    international agencies. I wouldn't elevate that kind of thinking to a doctrine    because I have too much respect for the word doctrine.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;SPIEGEL: Are you saying that diplomacy always    fails?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Krauthammer: No, foolishness does. Perhaps when    he gets nowhere on Iran, nowhere with North Korea, when he gets nothing from    the Russians in return for what he did to the Poles and the Czechs, gets    nowhere in the Middle East peace talks -- maybe at that point he'll begin to    rethink whether the world really runs by international norms, consensus, and    sweetness and light, or whether it rests on the foundation of American and    Western power that, in the final analysis, guarantees peace.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;SPIEGEL: That is the cynical    approach.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Krauthammer: The realist approach. Henry    Kissinger once said that peace can be achieved only one of two ways: hegemony    or balance of power. Now that is real realism. What the Obama administration    pretends is realism is naïve nonsense.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What  Were You Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-162406350729158813?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/162406350729158813'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/162406350729158813'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/10/obama-is-average.html' title='&apos;Obama Is Average&apos;'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-1508227950923975079</id><published>2009-10-24T12:08:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-24T12:12:38.060-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='authoritarianism'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='government control'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Czar'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Wall Street'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Pay Cuts'/><title type='text'>Pay Cuts!</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/varv10232009a20091023032202.jpg" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/a&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-1508227950923975079?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1508227950923975079'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1508227950923975079'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/10/pay-cuts.html' title='Pay Cuts!'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-2404599234661735993</id><published>2009-10-23T12:28:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-23T12:29:32.399-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Black Scholars speak to Our Times</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;Allan Erickson, on his "&lt;A  href="http://allanerickson.wordpress.com/2009/08/28/two-black-scholars-speak-to-our-times/"&gt;Goodness  World Life Blog&lt;/A&gt;," recently posted a letter written shortly after the 2008  presidential election&amp;nbsp;by Dr. Anne Wortham, an associate professor of  sociology at Illinois State University.&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;Read Dr. Wortham's letter here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A  href="http://allanerickson.wordpress.com/2009/08/28/two-black-scholars-speak-to-our-times/"&gt;http://allanerickson.wordpress.com/2009/08/28/two-black-scholars-speak-to-our-times/&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;This blog&amp;nbsp;post also includes the text of a speech by Justice Janice  Rogers Brown given to the Federalist Society at the University of Chicago back  in 2000.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Also included are&amp;nbsp;links to relevant articles by  columnists&amp;nbsp;Thomas Sowell, Walter&amp;nbsp;Williams, and Larry Elder.&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;Here's a quote from Justice Brown to whet your interest:&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; "Writing 50 years ago,    F.A. Hayek warned us that a centrally planned economy is 'The Road to    Serfdom.' He was right, of course; but the intervening years have shown us    that there are many other roads to serfdom. In fact, it now appears that human    nature is so constituted that, as in the days of empire, all roads led to    Rome; in the heyday of liberal democracy, all roads lead to slavery. And we no    longer find slavery abhorrent. We embrace it. We demand more. Big government    is not just the opiate of the masses. It is &lt;EM&gt;the&lt;/EM&gt; opiate. The drug of    choice for multinational corporations and single moms; for regulated    industries and rugged Midwestern farmers and militant senior citizens.&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; It is my thesis today    that the sheer tenacity of the collectivist impulse - whether you call it    socialism or communism or altruism - has changed not only the meaning of our    words, but the meaning of the Constitution, and the character of our    people."&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;Here's a quote from Dr. Sowell&amp;nbsp;regarding the government-based  health-care/medical insurance debate:&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; "Politicians are already    one of the main reasons why medical insurance is so expensive. Insurance is    designed to cover risks but politicians are in the business of distributing    largesse. Nothing is easier for politicians than to mandate things that    insurance companies must cover, without the slightest regard for how such    additional coverage will raise the cost of insurance.&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If insurance covered    only those things that most people are most concerned about-- the high cost of    a major medical expense-- the price would be much lower than it is today, with    politicians piling on mandate after mandate."&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;You can find the &lt;A  href="http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell1.asp"&gt;Thomas Sowell archives  here&lt;/A&gt;, the &lt;A  href="http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/williams1.asp"&gt;Walter Williams  archives here&lt;/A&gt;, and the &lt;A  href="http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/elder1.asp"&gt;Larry Elder archives  here&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp; I commend them to your reading if you would understand more of  the direction in which our country seems headed.&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You  Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-2404599234661735993?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2404599234661735993'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2404599234661735993'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/10/black-scholars-speak-to-our-times.html' title='Black Scholars speak to Our Times'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-980546893674999340</id><published>2009-10-17T22:42:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-17T22:42:44.173-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Cash for ... Golf Carts?</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Did you like the "Cash for Clunkers" deal that  Congress came up with for us?&amp;nbsp; Did you replace your old&amp;nbsp;car with a new  one?&amp;nbsp; Did you know that a golf cart qualifies as an "Electric Car" under  new government regulations and that you can get a tax credit when you buy  one?&amp;nbsp; Just one more example of the Unintended Consequences that happen over  and over again when Big Government tries to use taxpayer money to curry  favor.&amp;nbsp; Is this really the bunch you want in charge of your health  care?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;A  href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107204574473724099542430.html"&gt;Read  the Wall Street Journal article here&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Then go out and find yourself an  "electric car."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What  Were You Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-980546893674999340?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/980546893674999340'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/980546893674999340'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/10/cash-for-golf-carts.html' title='Cash for ... Golf Carts?'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-6178060621664389965</id><published>2009-10-16T11:02:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-16T11:02:44.144-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Obamacare and Abortion</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;In &lt;A  href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/15/morning-bell-obamacare-forces-you-to-fund-abortions/"&gt;Thursday's  article, the fourth in a week-long series&lt;/A&gt; on "Obamacare," the Heritage  Foundation discussed what some might call dishonesty coming from the White  House.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;While Obama has made public promises --&amp;nbsp;"Under  our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions" -- no specific  language has been put into the legislation currently being considered.&amp;nbsp;  White House spokesman Robert Gibbs has been less than forthcoming on the  issue.&amp;nbsp; a quote from the article:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"Conservatives introduced amendments in all five    committee markups (three in the House and two in the Senate) that would have    specifically prohibited federal funds from being used to cover abortion. None    of them passed. Worse, the "compromise" the White House has adopted is an    amendment sponsored by Rep. Lois Capps (D-CA) who has a 100% pro-abortion    voting record according to the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL).    Not only does the Capps amendment allow for federal money to subsidize    abortions in private plans and mandate federal funding for abortions in the    public option (this according to FactCheck.org), it also requires that at    least one insurance plan cover abortion in every geographical region in the    country."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;A  href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/16/morning-bell-obamacare-puts-you-on-welfare/"&gt;Friday's  article&lt;/A&gt; discusses another ramification of the so-called health-care reform,  the way that such reform will be implemented.&amp;nbsp; They expect to reduce the  number of uninsured by 29 million, but the devil is, as always, in the  details.&amp;nbsp; Here's a quote:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"..of those 29 million with new insurance    coverage, almost half (14 million), will get their coverage through the    welfare programs Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program    (SCHIP).&amp;nbsp; That is equivalent to adding every resident of Ohio and Nevada    to the welfare rolls.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;In other words, for half of those Americans who    are being promised health reform, they are going to be stunned to find    themselves in a welfare office applying for Medicaid. Under the current    baselines for Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program    (SCHIP), there will be 76 million individuals served by these programs for at    least some part of the year in 2019. If the SFC proposal becomes law, the    number on Medicaid/SCHIP will top 90 million. So why do Obamacare supporters    want to put 90 million Americans on the welfare rolls? It is cheaper than    providing them with real quality health care."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;This is nothing less than cost-shifting, plain and  simple.&amp;nbsp; Another quote:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Medicaid was originally created to provide access    to health care for families on welfare. Medicaid pays providers 20-25 percent    less than does the private sector, forcing doctors and hospitals to subsidize    Medicaid through lower rates. This deters doctors and hospitals from    participating in the program, creating a lack of access that itself is a form    of rationing. &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What  Were You Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-6178060621664389965?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6178060621664389965'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6178060621664389965'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/10/obamacare-and-abortion.html' title='Obamacare and Abortion'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-5172042348917458941</id><published>2009-10-14T21:26:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-14T21:27:14.525-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The Cost of Health-care Reform 2 &amp; 3</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;You can find&amp;nbsp;subsequent parts&amp;nbsp;of The  Heritage Foundation's week-long series on the costs of health-care reform at  their blog, &lt;A href="http://blog.heritage.org/"&gt;The Foundry&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp; They have  an entire &lt;A href="http://blog.heritage.org/category/health-care/"&gt;category of  health care&lt;/A&gt;, with articles they have generated as well as links to enough  other sources to give the interested reader an admirable breadth of information  on the issues involved with the current debate.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Part Two is titled "&lt;A  href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/13/morning-bell-obamacare-sends-deficits-off-cliff/"&gt;Obamacare  sends Deficits Off Cliff&lt;/A&gt;" and quotes an article at the Washington Post  titled "&lt;A  href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/09/AR2009100904189.html"&gt;Health  Reform Shell Game&lt;/A&gt;." The Post article cites "smoke and mirrors" in the Baucus  bill that you should find interesting. Neither are long reads, both are  well-researched and have enough evidential citations to satisfy&amp;nbsp;even the  most discriminating (or biased) reader.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Part Three is titled "&lt;A  href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/14/morning-bell-its-all-downhill-from-here/"&gt;It's  All Downhill From Here&lt;/A&gt;."&amp;nbsp; Here's a quote:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"The scariest part about yesterday's Senate    Finance Committee vote passing its version of Obamacare, is not what is in    their bill (to the extent that it even exists), but that the Finance Committee    bill promises to be the high water mark for "bipartisanship" in health care    reform.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Now all of the other bills will be merged    together behind the closed doors. All the bills are fundamentally flawed and    will only get worse as the leaders in the House and Senate have to commit to    actual details."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What  Were You Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-5172042348917458941?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5172042348917458941'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5172042348917458941'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/10/cost-of-health-care-reform-2-3.html' title='The Cost of Health-care Reform 2 &amp; 3'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-6985113435699915182</id><published>2009-10-14T20:24:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-14T20:26:01.454-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The Baucus Bill</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;The Senate Finance Committee&amp;nbsp;has passed  chairman Max Baucus's pet bill out to conference. Now a small group of  politicians will try to bring about a resolution between this and HR 3200 and  whatever ideas that&amp;nbsp;Obama and his White House cabal see fit to bring to the  table.&amp;nbsp; What do these proposals portend for the people of the  country?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Here's a quote for your consideration:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"Remember when health-care reform was supposed to    make life better for the middle class? That dream began to unravel this past    summer when Congress proposed a bill that failed to include any    competition-based reforms that would actually bend the curve of health-care    costs. It fell apart completely when Democrats began papering over the gaping    holes their plan would rip in the federal budget.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;As it now stands, the plan proposed by Democrats    and the Obama administration would not only fail to reduce the cost burden on    middle-class families, it would make that burden significantly    worse."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Here's another line from this Wall Street Journal  editorial:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"The Joint Committee on Taxation indicates that    87% of the burden would fall on Americans making less than $200,000, and more    than half on those earning under $100,000.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Industry fees are even worse because Democrats    chose to make these fees nondeductible. This means that insurance companies    will have to raise premiums significantly just to break even. American    families will bear a burden even greater than the $130 billion in fees that    the bill intends to collect. According to my analysis, premiums will rise by    as much as $200 billion over the next 10 years - and 90% will again fall on    the middle class."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;It is amazing to me that seemingly intelligent  people will ignore evidence such as this and still believe that they will  benefit from this massive&amp;nbsp; new entitlement program.&amp;nbsp; &lt;A  href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107204574471292249934348.html?mod=rss_opinion_main"&gt;Read  the entire&amp;nbsp;article here.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What  Were You Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-6985113435699915182?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6985113435699915182'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6985113435699915182'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/10/baucus-bill.html' title='The Baucus Bill'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-4784025154149146893</id><published>2009-10-12T11:37:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-12T11:37:29.269-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The Cost of Health-care Reform</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;The Heritage Foundation begins a week-long report  on how "ObamaCare" will affect each of us.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A  href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/12/morning-bell-obamacare-invades-your-wallet/"&gt;This  first segment&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;makes interesting reading, even for those who support  this political initiative into the private sector.&amp;nbsp; Here's a&amp;nbsp;teaser  for you:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;The Senate Finance Committee bill written by    Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) (the Baucus bill) first drives up the cost of    health insurance for all Americans and then forces everyone to buy it or face    tax penalties or jail time. While the Baucus bill does cap out-of-pocket costs    based on a person's income, the effect on American families is still    staggering. According to the Center for Data Analysis, the Baucus bill    would:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;   &lt;UL&gt;     &lt;LI&gt;For individuals making $34,140 (three times the Federal Poverty Level)      the Baucus health care proposal could mandate up to $4,097 in annual      premiums, a sum which could have been spent on over nine months of food,      almost four months of housing or well over a year of utilities.&lt;/LI&gt;     &lt;LI&gt;For a family of four making $69,480 (300% above poverty) the Baucus bill      mandates annual health insurance premiums of $8,338, which would be worth      the equivalent of over ten months of food, four months of housing or almost      two years of utilities.&lt;/LI&gt;     &lt;LI&gt;For individuals earning $45,520 (400% above poverty) Baucus mandates      $5,462 for health insurance, or over a year of food, four months of rent or      a year and a half of utilities.&lt;/LI&gt;     &lt;LI&gt;For families earning $92,640 (400% above poverty) Baucus mandates      $11,117 in health premiums, the equivalent of over a year of food, five      months of housing or two years of utilities.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;And those numbers include the subsidies for health insurance in the    Baucus bill. To pay for all this new health care spending, plus the massive    expansion of Medicaid, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the    Baucus bill will collect $4 billion in fines from those who do not purchase    insurance, $200 billion taxing health insurance companies with generous health    plans, and $25 billion in taxes on employers. Not to mention the billions in    cuts to Medicare payments to hospitals which will result in significant cost    shifting to consumers.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Read the article at &lt;A  href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/12/morning-bell-obamacare-invades-your-wallet/"&gt;&lt;FONT  size=3  face="Times New Roman"&gt;http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/12/morning-bell-obamacare-invades-your-wallet/&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;  or&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://bit.ly/nnYOU"&gt;http://bit.ly/nnYOU&lt;/A&gt; and then ask  yourself, "can I afford free health care?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What  Were You Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-4784025154149146893?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/4784025154149146893'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/4784025154149146893'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/10/cost-of-health-care-reform.html' title='The Cost of Health-care Reform'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-9208129876909612492</id><published>2009-10-06T05:35:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-06T05:59:48.302-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='green jobs'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='hoax'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Global Warming'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='science'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='politics'/><title type='text'>Global Climate Change</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What's your take on the issue?  Do you believe, as that great climatologist AlGore preaches, that we are in a man-caused time of warming that requires us to drastically curtail our economy in order to "save the planet?"  Or do you perceive climate change as naturally occurring, a cyclical series of warming and cooling that has been going on since God created the earth?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Well, you might be interested in &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wecnmagazine.com/2007issues/may/may07.html"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;an interview&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; with someone who has vastly more credibility than AlGore, a man with years of experience in the field of climatology.  It may well  be that this man is right, and that the public has been fed a 'bill of goods' for less-than-honorable purposes by politicians eager to control their lives.  Read the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wecnmagazine.com/2007issues/may/may07.html"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;interview with Dr. Reid Bryson&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;, a man who holds the 30th PHD ever granted in the field of Meteorology.  Read his credentials, consider what he says, and then ask yourself why Al Gore refuses to debate anyone who holds an opinion at odds with his own.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;You might also, if you're a thinking person who would rather make up your own mind, &lt;a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/10/un_climate_reports_they_lie.html"&gt;consider this article at the American Thinker&lt;/a&gt; that calls into question the motivation of those who would lead us back into the dark ages.  Oh, and be sure to read the comments.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-9208129876909612492?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/9208129876909612492'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/9208129876909612492'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/10/global-climate-change.html' title='Global Climate Change'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-6548814724633257813</id><published>2009-10-02T19:07:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-02T19:08:32.064-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The Role of Mothers in Society</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;There were three special ladies on the Glenn Beck  show today.&amp;nbsp; Three mothers who are, as are many of us, concerned about the  future we will leave to our children and grandchildren.&amp;nbsp; Each of them has  established a blog or website where they share their opinions on the great  issues that face our nation, it's citizens,&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;our leadership.&amp;nbsp;  Each of them offers the perspective of a mother on these issues, and I commend  their writings to you.&amp;nbsp; I also suggest that you consider joining the  "Sisterhood of Mommy Patriots."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Mary Baker - &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;A  href="http://marymbaker.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;FONT size=2  face=Arial&gt;http://marymbaker.blogspot.com/&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Mary is a mother of seven, a Christian Conservative  who says, "This blog has been created to bring a Christian Biblical and  Conservative prospective about events and issues of the day."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Mary Conley&amp;nbsp;- "As A Mom... A Sisterhood of  Mommy Patriots"&amp;nbsp;- &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;A href="http://asamom.ning.com/"&gt;&lt;FONT size=2  face=Arial&gt;http://asamom.ning.com/&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Barbara Curtis&amp;nbsp;- "Mommy Life"&amp;nbsp;- &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;A  href="http://mommylife.net/"&gt;&lt;FONT size=2  face=Arial&gt;http://mommylife.net/&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Barbara, who&amp;nbsp;is a mother of twelve,&amp;nbsp;says,  "..I'd judged Christians harshly all my life. But I discovered being a Christian  wasn't about following Christians - it's about following Christ."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What  Were You Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-6548814724633257813?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6548814724633257813'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6548814724633257813'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/10/role-of-mothers-in-society.html' title='The Role of Mothers in Society'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-941833034411853107</id><published>2009-10-01T23:54:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-10-01T23:58:51.270-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='health-care'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Pay-offs'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Chicago crooks'/><title type='text'>Busy, Busy, Busy!</title><content type='html'>&lt;img src="http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/varv09302009a20090930032145.jpg" /&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;"&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/a&gt;?"&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-941833034411853107?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/941833034411853107'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/941833034411853107'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/10/busy-busy-busy.html' title='Busy, Busy, Busy!'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-5473684263916495563</id><published>2009-09-24T12:38:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-24T12:53:56.168-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Medicare and Gag Orders</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;A short, interesting bit in &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204488304574431212166204156.html?mod=rss_opinion_main"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;the Wall Street Journa&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;l this morning, one you likely didn't hear about if you only pay attention to what was once the "Mainstream Media."  Here it is, in its entirety, for your edification.  It is sad enough that our elected legislators do not read the bills they vote on; it is truly unfortunate that those who write the laws for our country don't think that we have the right to find out the truth from other sources.  Do yourself a favor; read the first and last paragraphs a couple of times.  The article is sub-titled "Humana gets whacked for telling the truth; AARP gets a pass for spreading falsehoods."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;Maybe Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus should put a gag order on Douglas Elmendorf too. On Tuesday, the Congressional Budget Office director told Mr. Baucus's committee that its plan to cut $123 billion from Medicare Advantage - the program that gives almost one-fourth of seniors private health-insurance options - will result in lower benefits and some 2.7 million people losing this coverage.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"   style="  ;font-family:arial;font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;Imagine that. Last week Mr. Baucus ordered Medicare regulators to investigate and likely punish Humana Inc. for trying to educate enrollees in its Advantage plans about precisely this fact. Jonathan Blum, acting director of a regulatory office in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), said that a mailer Humana sent its customers was "misleading and confusing to beneficiaries, who may believe that it represents official communication about the Medicare Advantage program."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"   style="  ;font-family:arial;font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;Mr. Blum has also banned all Advantage contractors from telling their customers what Mr. Elmendorf has just told Congress. Mr. Blum happens to be a former senior aide to Mr. Baucus and a health adviser on the Obama transition team.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"   style="  ;font-family:arial;font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;Meanwhile, we have the case of the Association for the Advancement of Retired Persons (AARP), and its fanciful Medicare claims. The self-styled seniors lobby is using all its money and influence to cheer on ObamaCare, even though polls show that most retired persons oppose it. AARP has spent millions of dollars on its TV ad campaign and bulletins and newsletters to its members, including eight million direct-mail letters over Labor Day. The AARP Web site claims that it is a "myth" that "health care reform will hurt Medicare," while it is a "fact" that "none of the health care reform proposals being considered by Congress will cut Medicare benefits or increase your out-of-pocket costs."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"   style="  ;font-family:arial;font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;So why hasn't AARP also come under CMS scrutiny? Could that be because AARP, which markets its own branded Advantage plans with United HealthCare that have 1.7 million enrollees, is a reliable liberal ally? Certainly its claims are "misleading and confusing" - given that in this instance it is empirically untrue, unlike Humana's attempt at edification. Seniors might even think AARP's falsehoods represent official communication about the Medicare Advantage program. But don't expect Mr. Baucus or CMS to impose its gag rule on the AARP's pro-ObamaCare advocacy.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"   style="  ;font-family:arial;font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;We don't think AARP should be muzzled in a political debate, but neither should the insurance industry - especially by an influential Senator getting favors from his crony in a supposedly impartial regulatory agency that has enormous power to harm or destroy private companies. Seniors have a right to know how they may be affected by Washington's health-care planning.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"   style="  ;font-family:arial;font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;So, for the record, CBO's Mr. Elmendorf says that cuts to Medicare Advantage "could lead many plans to limit the benefits they offer, raise their premiums, or withdraw from the program."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-5473684263916495563?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5473684263916495563'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5473684263916495563'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/09/medicare-and-gag-orders.html' title='Medicare and Gag Orders'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-2021504409128089093</id><published>2009-09-22T11:40:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-22T12:17:50.886-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='rookie'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='The Economist'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Protectionism'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Tariff'/><title type='text'>Economic Vandalism</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;Probably not a lot of folks on this side of the pond read &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;The Economist&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;, one of Britain's premier news and business magazines. That's a shame. The current issue (September 19th-25th 2009) has an &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?story_id=14450332&amp;amp;source=most_commented"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;article entitled &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?story_id=14450332&amp;amp;source=most_commented"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;Economic Vandalism&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;, investigating the potential cause and effects of the President's recently enacted 35% tariff on tires imported from China.  The Economist calls this "A protectionist move that is bad politics, bad economics, bad diplomacy and hurts America." How about a few teasers before you click the link to read the entire article?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;You can be fairly sure that when a government slips an announcement out at nine o’clock on a Friday night, it is not proud of what it is doing. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;In every other way the president’s decision to slap a 35% tariff on imported Chinese tyres looks like a colossal blunder, confirming his critics’ worst fears about the president’s inability to stand up to his party’s special interests and stick to the centre ground he promised to occupy in office.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;..no one can seriously imagine that any American tyre-making job will be saved; firms will simply import cheap tyres from other low-cost places like India and Brazil.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;The tyre decision needs to be set into the context of a string of ominously protectionist policies which started within weeks of the inauguration with a nasty set of "Buy America" provisions for public-works contracts. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;Besides these sins of commission sit the sins of omission: the president has done nothing at all to advance the three free-trade packages that are pending in Congress, with Colombia, Panama and South Korea, three solid American allies who deserve much better.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;In a section headed "Dumb and Dumber" are these comments:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;Evidence of a weak president being pushed leftward might cause investors to worry whether he will prove similarly feeble when it comes to reining in the vast deficits he is now racking up; and that might spook the buyers of bonds that finance all those deficits. Looming large among these, of course, are the Chinese. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;Under the relevant trade laws, Mr Obama had the absolute discretion not to impose the recommended tyre tariffs on the grounds of overall economic interest or national security. Given everything that is at stake, his decision not to exercise it amounts to an act of vandalism.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;If you think, "well, that's just one tariff. What harm could that do?"  Here's &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125357990638429655.html"&gt;another article, this one in &lt;/a&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125357990638429655.html"&gt;the Wall Street Journal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125357990638429655.html"&gt; today&lt;/a&gt;, that talks about a similar tariff enacted in the early 1960's that still causes problems and significant waste as businesses find ways to get around the onerous tax that are still in place long after the situation that brought it about has been made moot.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-2021504409128089093?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2021504409128089093'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2021504409128089093'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/09/economic-vandalism.html' title='Economic Vandalism'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-2126937102026302436</id><published>2009-09-21T15:06:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-22T11:39:47.431-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Medicare for All?</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;The Top Ten reasons Medicare should not be a model  for Health Care reform:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Medicare is going bankrupt.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Private payers are bailing out  Medicare.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Expansion of entitlement programs  threatens our economic security.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Low administrative costs are a  mirage.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Medicare is rife with fraud.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Medicare short-changes  seniors.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Medicare's model is obsolete.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Payments are too low.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Medical decisions are made in  Washington.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;No one is running the show.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204884404574362543878647858.html"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Read  the article&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;, which includes an explanation of these reasons, in the  September 11, 2009 issue of the Wall Street Journal.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;When Obama made his statement about number five in  his speech to congress, I immediately asked, "If you know there's fraud, why  aren't you doing something about it now? Why must you wait for this obscenely  abusive "reform bill" before acting?" Estimates of fraud range from three to ten  percent of all health care spending.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What  Were You Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-2126937102026302436?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2126937102026302436'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2126937102026302436'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/09/medicare-for-all.html' title='Medicare for All?'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-5769738637358552819</id><published>2009-09-18T23:55:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-19T00:23:58.337-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The President's Promises</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Obama made a lot of bold promises during his speech to Congress last week. He will likely make more on Sunday, when he hits every morning talk show except the one place where he might be asked some probing questions. The question we need answered is, was Joe Wilson right? Is this guy telling us the truth or not? Perhaps you're not one of those "true believers" who accept every word from his mouth. Perhaps you prefer to look at the evidence and make up your own mind. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=337562347635294"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;This Editorial&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; at Investor's Business Daily a week ago examines those promises and points out some significant discrepancies. I find it interesting that while Obama spoke all evening about "My Plan," he hasn't revealed any of the details of it. The only bills we can examine are HR 3200 from the House of Representatives, and the proposal by Max Baucus (D-Montana) from the Senate. This one has no Republican endorsement; neither have any endearing features to this reader.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;So take a look at &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=337562347635294"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;the IBD examination of Obama's speech&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;. Make up your own mind. Don't let anyone; politician, personality, reporter, whoever; tell you what you should think about this important issue. If the provisions of HR 3200 and Baucus's bill are passed by congress, get signed into law, and you should happen to live long enough to have to deal with the consequences, you want to at least be able to say "I knew what was coming. I told you so!"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-5769738637358552819?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5769738637358552819'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5769738637358552819'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/09/presidents-promises.html' title='The President&apos;s Promises'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-7697412532886429155</id><published>2009-09-18T16:23:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-18T16:37:47.835-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='WSJ'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='knowledge'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='principles'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='politics'/><title type='text'>Are we indeed Ignorant?</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Nobel laureate Friedrich A. Hayek in &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;The Constitution of Liberty:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"All political theories assume, of course, that most individuals are very ignorant. Those who plead for liberty differ from the rest in that they include among the ignorant themselves as well as the wisest. Compared with the totality of knowledge which is continually utilized in the evolution of a dynamic civilization, the difference between the knowledge that the wisest and that the most ignorant individual can deliberately employ is comparatively insignificant."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;This should give us all hope, eh?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-7697412532886429155?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7697412532886429155'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7697412532886429155'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/09/are-we-indeed-ignorant.html' title='Are we indeed Ignorant?'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-8791435026010575400</id><published>2009-09-18T12:35:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-18T12:35:35.333-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Whose Decision?</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;SPAN  style="WIDOWS: 2; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; BORDER-COLLAPSE: separate; FONT: medium 'Times New Roman'; WHITE-SPACE: normal; ORPHANS: 2; LETTER-SPACING: normal; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); WORD-SPACING: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"  class=Apple-style-span&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; FONT-SIZE: 13px"  class=Apple-style-span&gt; &lt;P&gt;"Some lives may indeed be impossible to save. But what we have here is a  government bureaucracy that has the power to determineas a matter of  policy&lt;I&gt;not&lt;/I&gt;&lt;SPAN class=Apple-converted-space&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;to save lives  that&lt;I&gt;could be&lt;/I&gt;&lt;SPAN class=Apple-converted-space&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;saved. In  essence, determining whose life is worth the expense.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;The proper, biblical role of government is to protect the well-being of its  citizensto provide security and promote justice, not to usher them into the  next world by denying them medical care.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Do we need health care reform? Of course we do; I've said so before. But as  Christians, we must not assent to giving unaccountable bureaucrats the power to  determine the value of a human lifeor to withhold medical care from those whose  survival is somehow deemed outside the national interest."&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;From Charles Colson's Breakpoint column, Sept 18, 2009.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;&lt;A  href="http://www.informz.net/pfm/archives/archive_849993.html"&gt;http://www.informz.net/pfm/archives/archive_849993.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;FONT  size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;to read the entire column.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What  Were You Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-8791435026010575400?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/8791435026010575400'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/8791435026010575400'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/09/whose-decision.html' title='Whose Decision?'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-1730581083686294474</id><published>2009-09-16T16:33:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-16T16:40:44.272-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='treasury'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='conservative'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='TEA party'/><title type='text'>Lloyd Marcus, American</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/09/black_tea_party_express_tour_t.html"&gt;Read&lt;/a&gt; the experiences of a black conservative &lt;a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/09/black_tea_party_express_tour_t.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;; then watch the video.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="white-space: pre; "&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;object width="500" height="405"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RkWQ4uolB8Q&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;amp;border=1"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RkWQ4uolB8Q&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="405"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="white-space: pre; "&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="white-space: pre; "&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-1730581083686294474?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1730581083686294474'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1730581083686294474'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/09/lloyd-marcus-american.html' title='Lloyd Marcus, American'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-7928559738866428361</id><published>2009-09-15T11:47:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-15T11:52:17.164-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='government control'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='hoax'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='health-care'/><title type='text'>"Government Can Fix It"</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IMAGES/CARTOONS/toon090909.gif"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IMAGES/CARTOONS/toon090909.gif" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-7928559738866428361?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7928559738866428361'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7928559738866428361'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/09/government-can-fix-it.html' title='&quot;Government Can Fix It&quot;'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-5132905243644006323</id><published>2009-09-02T09:45:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-02T09:59:52.121-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='extremism'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='health-care'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='right to Life'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='human rights'/><title type='text'>Cancer Treatment or Assisted Suicide?</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Who is more sympathetic to the plight of the patient, Big Government or Big Business? Watch this video to the end before you decide.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;object width="480" height="385"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qEK_GH7sgcc&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;amp;color2=0xfebd01"&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qEK_GH7sgcc&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;amp;color2=0xfebd01" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;This is "health-care" in the state of Oregon, a pattern many in the Federal Government think ought to be extended to the rest of the country.  Government makes the decisions about treatment, not the doctor, certainly not the patient.  I don't think I care to participate, thank you very much.  Is this the sort of "health-care" that our president says we are owed as a right?  The Declaration of Independence says we have a right "to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness."  Notice that Life comes first; without Life, the others don't mean much.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"   style="font-family:arial;font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13px;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You Thinking?&lt;/a&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-5132905243644006323?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5132905243644006323'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5132905243644006323'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/09/cancer-treatment-or-assisted-suicide.html' title='Cancer Treatment or Assisted Suicide?'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-1348247460399351821</id><published>2009-08-29T14:21:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-08-29T15:17:24.121-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='WSJ'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Chris Dodd'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='health-care'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Specter'/><title type='text'>Health-Care Secrets</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;There's an old saying in Texas, used when one perceives that he's not being told the truth:  "Don't piss in my ear and tell me it's raining!"  That's exactly what's going on in town halls around the country.  In the weekend edition of the Wall Street Journal, there's&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203946904574301050879872972.html?mod=rss_opinion_main"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; this little blurb&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; about how the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee (chaired by Chris Dodd, D-Conn), passed out an amended $1 trillion health-care bill back on July 15. Earlier this month, Senator Arlen Specter (D-Penn) told a town hall meeting that those opposed to the present monstrous HR3200 are "just wrong; the Senate doesn't have a bill yet."  Well, the only true part about that is they haven't turned over their cards yet.  The Democrats in the senate have known since the middle of July what they intend to inflict on us, but they haven't seen fit to tell us.  They haven't even shared it with the Republican senators.  And you really believed these clowns when they promised an "open, transparent government?"  Do you really think they want an open, honest government when they pull this sort of crap and then expect to pass the legislation without allowing time for public commentary?  My friend, they were peeing in your ear then, and they're doing it now.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-1348247460399351821?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1348247460399351821'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1348247460399351821'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/08/health-care-secrets.html' title='Health-Care Secrets'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-7146054064142700813</id><published>2009-08-28T14:00:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-08-28T14:11:04.999-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Dick Morris on Joe Lieberman</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;On Tuesday the 25th, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/2009/08/25/lieberman-opens-the-door-to-democratic-retreat"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Dick Morris wrote a piece&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; on comments by Joe Lieberman (I-Conn) regarding HR 3200 -- the Obama/Democrat Party proposal to reform health care.  A couple of interesting paragraphs:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;     &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;If the elderly are worried about the projected $500 billion cut in Medicare and Medicaid over the ensuing decade and conservatives fret over socialization of healthcare, the average American can relate most easily to the concerns over the size of the debt and the deficit that Lieberman articulates.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;     &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Lieberman’s critique gives moderates a place to go in the healthcare debate. Caught in the tug between the liberals who dominate Democratic primaries and the more conservative voices that may prevail in November, centrist Democrats can rally easily around the “not now” approach of Joe Lieberman. It is obvious that, despite the Obama majorities in Congress, this is the exact wrong time to embark on a major new government spending program.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-7146054064142700813?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7146054064142700813'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7146054064142700813'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/08/dick-morris-on-joe-lieberman.html' title='Dick Morris on Joe Lieberman'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-4376643257479079841</id><published>2009-08-26T09:55:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-08-26T10:01:58.118-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Read the Bill!!</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/gm09082620090825115653.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 462px; height: 350px;" src="http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/gm09082620090825115653.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Can you imagine what HR 3200 will do to &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.usdebtclock.org/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;our National Debt&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-4376643257479079841?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/4376643257479079841'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/4376643257479079841'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/08/read-bill.html' title='Read the Bill!!'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-179220383139969970</id><published>2009-08-25T13:38:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2009-08-28T14:13:52.467-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Obama's Summer of Discontent</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"   style="font-family:arial;font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:13px;"&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Fouad Ajami has &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203706604574370301468452872.html"&gt;an op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal today&lt;/a&gt;, pointing out the emptiness inherent in the election of the current occupant of the Oval Office and suggesting that Americans who value substance over style are now coming to understand the enormity of what they have done.  I only hope that there are more of us who understand and prefer substance than those who would rather think they can get a free ride off the successful part of the.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Click the link above and read the article; here are the last two paragraphs:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;        American democracy has never been democracy by plebiscite, a process by which a leader is anointed, then the populace steps out of the way, and the anointed one puts his political program in place. In the American tradition, the "mandate of heaven" is gained and lost every day and people talk back to their leaders. They are not held in thrall by them. The leaders are not infallible or a breed apart. That way is the Third World way, the way it plays out in Arab and Latin American politics.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;        Those protesters in those town-hall meetings have served notice that Mr. Obama's charismatic moment has passed. Once again, the belief in that American exception that set this nation apart from other lands is re-emerging. Health care is the tip of the iceberg. Beneath it is an unease with the way the verdict of the 2008 election was read by those who prevailed. It shall be seen whether the man swept into office in the moment of national panic will adjust to the nation's recovery of its self-confidence.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-179220383139969970?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/179220383139969970'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/179220383139969970'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/08/obamas-summer-of-discontent.html' title='Obama&apos;s Summer of Discontent'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-6526322496792525156</id><published>2009-08-21T17:05:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-08-21T17:16:21.287-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Voter Intimidation</title><content type='html'>So what is it: illegal intimidation of registered voters by thugs, or just another tool in the arsenal of Democrat operatives? Why did the Justice Department, under Attorney General Eric Halder, choose to drop a case against members of the New Black Panther party in Philadelphia, when they had a slam-dunk winner? &lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;President Obama is a lawyer; AG Holder is a lawyer; doesn't it seem odd that these two, both of whom have taken an oath to protect and defend the Constitution and, by extention, the Law of the Land, have seen fit to ignore this law against voter intimidation?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;There are larger questions here, deserving of answers. &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203550604574361071968458430.html?mod=rss_opinion_main"&gt;Wall Street Journalist John Fund&lt;/a&gt; provides more information... if you're interested!&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;"&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/a&gt;?"&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-6526322496792525156?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6526322496792525156'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6526322496792525156'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/08/voter-intimidation.html' title='Voter Intimidation'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-7376939977266583958</id><published>2009-08-18T17:15:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-08-21T17:02:29.975-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Death by Bureaucratic Fiat.</title><content type='html'>&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/ED-AK020_klavan_G_20090817171243.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 553px; height: 369px;" src="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/ED-AK020_klavan_G_20090817171243.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;There is &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/n8vxmf"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;an  article in the Wall Street Journal today &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;that should be read by  anyone who contemplates a need for medical care in their future, and who  wonders how they might fare under a nationalized health care system.   Obama's independant panel will, under HR 3200, decide who receives care and  who does not, and it's not a pretty thing to think about.  Imagine yourself  coming before the panel, asking for medical care that will save and prolong your  life.  Imagine their answer.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You  Thinking?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;" &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-7376939977266583958?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7376939977266583958'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7376939977266583958'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/08/death-by-bureaucratic-fiat.html' title='Death by Bureaucratic Fiat.'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-8752329326123625584</id><published>2009-08-12T23:59:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-08-13T00:03:39.672-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Democrat's Worst Nightmare</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.jewishworldreview.com/toons/fuller/TownHall_fuller.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 555px; height: 444px;" src="http://www.jewishworldreview.com/toons/fuller/TownHall_fuller.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;..or maybe it's just a Republican response to ACORN agitators.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-8752329326123625584?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/8752329326123625584'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/8752329326123625584'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/08/democrats-worst-nightmare.html' title='Democrat&apos;s Worst Nightmare'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-2656399796022886487</id><published>2009-08-12T14:01:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-08-12T14:17:25.132-04:00</updated><title type='text'>What Does HR 3200 Actually Say?</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;If you don't want to read the entire 1016 pages of  House Resolution 3200 - the "America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009" -  then you might consider a summary by someone who has done the homework that we  each should have already done.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;A  href="http://www.classicalideals.com/HR3200.htm"&gt;http://www.classicalideals.com/HR3200.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;FONT  size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;was put together by &lt;A  href="http://www.classicalideals.com/cv.htm"&gt;Dr. John David  Lewis&lt;/A&gt;,&amp;nbsp;professor of Classical History and Political Economics at Duke  University.&amp;nbsp; He provides questions, the applicable sections from HR 3200,  and his evaluation of the proposed law.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What  Were You Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-2656399796022886487?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2656399796022886487'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2656399796022886487'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/08/what-does-hr-3200-actually-say.html' title='What Does HR 3200 Actually Say?'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-2147863958688712426</id><published>2009-08-08T16:54:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-08-08T16:54:38.074-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Support for Health Care Reform</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;So what level of support is there for a major  change in Health Care in this country? An article by Scott Rasmussen in the Wall  Street Journal reports some interesting statistics from recent polls, just a day  after the current resident of the Oval Office said that those who oppose the  idea should keep their mouths shut.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;So what do the people think?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;- Obama says the plan he's selling will reduce  costs, but 53% of the people believe it will have the opposite  effect.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;- 74% rate the quality of care they currently  receive as good or excellent.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;- 50% of people fear that if this plan is passed, it will result in a  decline in quality of care.&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;- By a factor of two to one, people think that no matter how bad things  might be, congressional action will only make them worse.&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;- 78% of folks agree that passage of the current congressional plan is  likely to mean higher taxes for the middle class&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;- Although 63% of voters agree that all Americans should have "quality,  affordable health care," only 28% are willing to pay higher taxes to achieve  that goal.&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;- Although 25% of voters strongly support the reform effort, 41% strongly  oppose it.&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;-&amp;nbsp;48% of voters now rate the U.S. health-care system as good or  excellent. This is up from 29% a year ago.&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;-&amp;nbsp;19% of voters now rate the U.S. health-care system as poor. This  is&amp;nbsp;down from 37% a year ago.&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;- Currently, 76% of Democrat voters favor the reform plan being touted by  Obama and the congressional Democrats.&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;- Currently, 35% of unaffiliated voters favor the plan, versus 60% who are  opposed.&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;- Of these unaffiliated voters, only 16% strongly favor the plan, while 47%  strongly oppose it.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;The House Resolution, euphemistically called "America's Affordable Health  Choices Act of 2009," can be &lt;A  href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.3200:"&gt;found here&lt;/A&gt;.  Please read it.&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;Mr Rasumssen's data can be &lt;A href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/"&gt;found  here&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;Rasmussen's Op Ed piece can be &lt;A  href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204313604574330442429438938.html"&gt;found  here&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You  Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-2147863958688712426?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2147863958688712426'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2147863958688712426'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/08/support-for-health-care-reform.html' title='Support for Health Care Reform'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-3033869374413501489</id><published>2009-07-30T18:10:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-30T18:40:49.890-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Disaster in the Making</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;Dr. Thomas Sowell is not only a prescient reader of our postmodern society, he is a student of economics who recognizes the precarious financial condition we find our country in today.  This is &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2009/07/28/disaster_in_the_making?page=full&amp;amp;comments=true"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;his column from July 29&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;, as published on &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://townhall.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;Townhall.com&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;.  If you would like to read some of his previous columns, you can find them at &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell1.asp"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;Jewish World Review&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;.  But the economy is only one, and perhaps not the least, of the problems being created by this misguided administration...&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;After many a disappointment with someone, and especially after a disaster, we may be able to look back at numerous clues that should have warned us that the person we trusted did not deserve our trust.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;When that person is the President of the United States, the potential for disaster is virtually unlimited.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;Many people are rightly worried about what this administration's reckless spending will do to the economy in our time and to our children and grandchildren, to whom a staggering national debt will be passed on. But if the worst that Barack Obama does is ruin the economy, I will breathe a sigh of relief.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;He is heading this country toward disaster on many fronts, including a nuclear Iran, which has every prospect of being an irretrievable disaster of almost unimaginable magnitude. We cannot put that genie back in the bottle-- and neither can generations yet unborn. They may yet curse us all for leaving them hostages to nuclear terror.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;     Conceivably, Israel can spare us that fate by taking out the Iranian nuclear facilities, instead of relying on Obama's ability to talk the Iranians out of going nuclear.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;     What the Israelis cannot spare us, however, are our own internal problems, of which the current flap over President Obama's injecting himself into a local police issue is just a small sign of a very big danger.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;Nothing has torn more countries apart from inside like racial and ethnic polarization. Just this year, a decades-long civil war, filled with unspeakable atrocities, has finally ended in Sri Lanka. The painful irony is that, when the British colony of Ceylon became the independent nation of Sri Lanka in 1948, its people were considered to be a shining example for the world of good relations between a majority (the Sinhalese) and a minority (the Tamils). That all changed when politicians decided to "solve" the "problem" that the Tamil minority was much more economically successful than the Sinhalese majority. Group identity politics led to group preferences and quotas that escalated into polarization, mob violence and ultimately civil war.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;Group identity politics has poisoned many other countries, including at various times Kenya, Czechoslovakia, Fiji, Guyana, Canada, Nigeria, India, and Rwanda. In some countries the polarization has gone as far as mass expulsions or civil war.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;     The desire of many Americans for a "post-racial" society is well-founded, though the belief that Barack Obama would move in that direction was extremely ill-advised, given the history of his actions and associations.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;This is a president on a mission to remake American society in every aspect, by whatever means are necessary and available. That requires taking all kinds of decisions out of the hands of ordinary Americans and transferring them to Washington elites-- and ultimately the number one elite, Barack Obama himself.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;Like so many before him who have ruined countries around the world, Obama has a greatly inflated idea of his own capabilities and the prospects of what can be accomplished by rhetoric or even by political power. Often this has been accompanied by an ignorance of history, including the history of how many people before him have tried similar things with disastrous results.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;During a recent TV interview, when President Obama was asked about the prospects of victory in Afghanistan, he replied that it would not be victory like in World War II, with "Hirohito coming down and signing a surrender to MacArthur." In reality, it was more than a year after Japanese officials surrendered on the battleship Missouri before Hirohito met General Douglas MacArthur for the first time.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;This is not the first betrayal of his ignorance by Obama, nor the first overlooked by the media. Moreover, ignorance by itself is not nearly as bad as charging full steam ahead, pretending to know. Barack Obama is doing that on a lot of issues, not just history or a local police incident in Massachusetts.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;While the mainstream media in America will never call him on this, these repeated demonstrations of his amateurism and immaturity will not go unnoticed by this country's enemies around the world. And &lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;it is the American people who will pay the price.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-3033869374413501489?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/3033869374413501489'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/3033869374413501489'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/07/disaster-in-making.html' title='Disaster in the Making'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-7346297764190073073</id><published>2009-07-24T11:16:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-24T11:24:01.219-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Peggy Noonan on Common Sense</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;If you take the Wall Street Journal, you've probably already read Ms. Noonan's very cogent op-ed piece today. If not, you can &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.peggynoonan.com/article.php?article=482"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;find it on-line here&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;. Here's a short clip, the "Common Sense" part:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;     I think the plan is being slowed and may well be stopped not by ideology, or even by philosophy in a strict sense, but by simple American common sense. I suspect voters, the past few weeks, have been giving themselves an internal Q-and-A that goes something like this:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;     Will whatever health care bill is produced by Congress increase the deficit? "Of course." Will it mean tax increases? "Of course." Will it mean new fees or fines? "Probably." Can I afford it right now? "No, I’m already getting clobbered." Will it make the marketplace freer and better? "Probably not." Is our health care system in crisis? "Yeah, it has been for years." Is it the most pressing crisis right now? "No, the economy is." Will a health-care bill improve the economy? "I doubt it."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-7346297764190073073?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7346297764190073073'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7346297764190073073'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/07/peggy-noonan-on-common-sense.html' title='Peggy Noonan on Common Sense'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-9118991468163301195</id><published>2009-07-23T13:55:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-23T13:56:18.740-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Obama's Empty MedPac Promise</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;From &lt;A  href="http://paracom.paramountcommunication.com/hostedemail/email.htm?h=4c13dcf5cf3d850a438e43dc9d6679be&amp;amp;CID=4444183999&amp;amp;ch=C8906DC7E033EA64466542D7124945D7"&gt;the  Heritage Foundation&lt;/A&gt; this morning:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Americans may distrust  economists, and most of them would have a rough time with an Econ 101 final exam  if they had to take it today, but through everyday experience Americans also  have internalized one of the most fundamental concepts of economics: there is no  such thing as a free lunch. And it is because Americans instinctively believe in  this fundamentally conservative concept that poll after poll shows Americans no  longer trust President Barack Obama on health care. Americans know Obama is not  telling the truth and that fact was crystallized in this exchange from last  night's press conference:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;JAKE TAPPER ABC NEWS: You said earlier that you  wanted to tell the American people what's in it for them, how will their family  benefit from health-care reform. But experts say that in addition to the  benefits that you're pushing, there is going to have to be some sacrifice in  order for there to be true cost-cutting measures, such as Americans giving up  tests, referrals, choice, end-of-life care.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; When you describe  health-care reform, you don't - understandably, you don't talk about the  sacrifices that Americans might have to make. Do you think - do you accept the  premise that other than some tax increases, on the wealthiest Americans, the  American people are going to have to give anything up in order for this to  happen?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;PRESIDENT OBAMA: They're going to have to give up  paying for things that don't make them healthier. And I - speaking as an  American, I think that's the kind of change you want.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; In other words, Obama  wants Americans to believe that his health plan covers the uninsured, improves  patient care, puts "more money in people's pockets," all while adding nothing to  the deficit. Obama is trying to convince Americans to disregard every ounce of  common sense that they have and believe he is selling them an actual free lunch.  Americans have every right to be skeptical. Take Obama's claims that he can  control health care costs by giving more power to a group of experts known as  MedPac (Medicare Payment Advisory Commission).&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Congress already has a  long track record of putting into place seemingly automatic spending reductions  in health, only to block them later. For instance, Congress routinely rolls back  the "sustainable growth rate" trimming of Medicare physician payments that were  supposed to keep down Medicare costs. Congress similarly decided to ignore the  requirement in the 2003 prescription drug legislation that it automatically  consider White House proposals to limit taxpayer subsidies for Medicare.  Americans have every right to be skeptical about this latest gimmick's capacity  for actually bringing down costs. If our health care spending crisis is a  long-term one, like Obama says, then Americans should demand that Obama prove he  can contain costs in Medicare first before creating a new trillion dollar budget  busting entitlement.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; But what if Obama's MedPac  idea did work? That might even be a bigger threat to American's health care. It  would be the equivalent of a federal health board determining how health care  was rationed for all seniors. Combined with the public plan proposal, that would  be another huge lurch towards taking the control of health care out of the hands  of patients and their doctors.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Despite Obama's constant  insistence otherwise, conservatives do have an alternative vision for health  care reform and do not favor the "status quo." For example, Obama wants one  single committee of "experts" in Washington to make all medical decisions for  everyone in the country. Conservatives take a polar opposite approach. We want  to rebuild the health care system from the ground up, not the top down. We want  millions of Americans sitting down with their doctors and making millions of  decisions every day about what procedures and treatments are best for them. The  media is right to be calling out the President for delivering false rhetoric on  health care. He's asking us to trust him on a trillion dollar plan he has not  read, and to dismiss what all Americans inherently know: Everything has a  price.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What  Were You Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-9118991468163301195?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/9118991468163301195'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/9118991468163301195'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/07/obamas-empty-medpac-promise.html' title='Obama&apos;s Empty MedPac Promise'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-4377266994454503595</id><published>2009-07-22T18:24:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-22T18:28:40.641-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Time to Quit Digging</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_567aVEoiH00/SmeRqPmgjjI/AAAAAAAAAls/tFJ29ivd8SE/s1600-h/deficitcartoonsize.gif"&gt;&lt;img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 296px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_567aVEoiH00/SmeRqPmgjjI/AAAAAAAAAls/tFJ29ivd8SE/s400/deficitcartoonsize.gif" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5361414036336447026" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;That should be intuitively obvious, wouldn't you think?&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;"&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You Thinking?&lt;/a&gt;"&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-4377266994454503595?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/4377266994454503595'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/4377266994454503595'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/07/time-to-quit-digging.html' title='Time to Quit Digging'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_567aVEoiH00/SmeRqPmgjjI/AAAAAAAAAls/tFJ29ivd8SE/s72-c/deficitcartoonsize.gif' height='72' width='72'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-2426173757479235604</id><published>2009-07-22T12:28:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-22T12:29:05.406-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Does Ted Kennedy deserve his extended cancer care?</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;A  href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/07/does_ted_kennedy_deserve_his_e.html"&gt;James  Lewis has an article&lt;/A&gt; today in The American Thinker, that should  spur&amp;nbsp;questions about Obama's socialized health care.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Senator Ted Kennedy, who  is now 76 years old and was diagnosed with brain cancer in May of last year, is  telling the world that nationalized medical care is "the cause of his life." He  wants to see it pass as soon as possible, before he departs this vale of tears.  &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The prospect of Kennedy's  passing is viewed by the liberal press with anticipatory tears and  mourning.&amp;nbsp; But they are not asking the proper question by their own lights:  That question -- which will be asked for you and me when we reach his age and  state in life --- is this:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Is Senator Kennedy's  life valuable enough to dedicate millions of dollars to extending it another  month, another day, another year?&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Because Barack Obama and  Ted Kennedy agree with each other that they of all people are entitled to make  that decision. Your decision to live or die will now be in their  hands.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Ted Kennedy is now 76.  Average life expectancy in the United States is 78.06. For a man who has already  reached 76, life expectancy is somewhat longer than average (since people who  die younger lower the national average); for a wealthy white man it may be  somewhat longer statistically; but for a man with diagnosed brain cancer it is  correspondingly less. As far as the actuarial tables of the Nanny State are  concerned, Kennedy is due to leave this life some time soon. The socialist State  is not sentimental, at least when it comes to the lives of ordinary people like  you and me.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The socialist question --  and yes, it is being asked very openly in socialist countries all around the  world, like Britain and Sweden -- must be whether extending Senator Kennedy's  life by another day, another month or year is socially valuable enough&amp;nbsp;to  pay for what is no doubt a gigantic and growing medical bill. Kennedy is a US  Senator, and all that money has been coughed up without complaint by the US  taxpayer. Kennedy is already entitled to Federal health care, and it is no doubt  the best available to anyone in the world.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Before he dies, Senator  Kennedy wants to feel sure that you and I and our loved ones can put that  personal decision about life or death safely in the hands of a Federal  bureaucrat. It is "the cause of his life," we are told.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Now there are many people  in this country who believe that Ted Kennedy has not spent his life very  constructively. Mary Jo Kopechne's family might still want to trade his life for  hers, if she could be brought back. Senator Kennedy has exercised more power  over our immigration chaos than any other person in the last half century. 9/11  was committed by illegal entrants who slipped through our deliberately  full-of-holes borders, using all manner of Kennedy-authored loopholes and  enforcement gaps.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Others might point to the  socialist habit of importing vast numbers of voters from Pakistan and Somalia  into Western Europe, to make for cheap socialist votes in order to defeat and  scapegoat native Europeans. Socialism by immigrant vote buying is happening in  every single socialist country in Europe. It is what keeps socialist parties  there in power. Kennedy has opened our borders for precisely that kind of  takeover by masses of illegal immigrants.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; So there might be a  rational debate over the social utility of Senator Kennedy's life. We could all  have a great national debate about it. Maybe we should do exactly that, to face  the consequences of what the Left sees as so humane, so obviously benevolent,  and so enlightened.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Consider what happens in  the Netherlands to elderly people. The Netherlands legalized "assisted suicide"  in 2002, no doubt in part for compassionate reasons. But also to save money.  There is only one money kitty for medical care in the socialist Netherlands.  When you get old, the question is asked, either explicitly or by  implication:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Do you deserve to live  another year compared to young refugees from Somalia, who can use the same euros  to have many years of life?&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; There's only so much money  available. The Netherlands radio service had a quiz show at one time, designed  to "raise public awareness" about precisely that question. Who deserves to live,  and who to die?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; But nobody debates any  more about who has the power to make that decision. In socialist Europe the  State does. It's a done deal.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The Netherlands legally  recognizes four categories of euthanasia.&amp;nbsp; One of them is:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Passive euthanasia: A physician may choose not to    treat an recurrent disease or event in a patient with a terminal progressive    disease.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I don't know enough about  Senator Kennedy's condition, but I would suppose that he has "a recurrent  disease or ... a terminal progressive disease." That would be the case if his  brain cancer is not curable. In the socialist Netherlands Kennedy would be a  perfect candidate for passive euthanasia.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Has anyone raised this  question with Senator Kennedy? I know it seems to be in bad taste to even  mention it. But if ObamaCare passes in the coming weeks, you can be sure that  that question will be raised for you and me, and our loved ones. And no, we will  not have a choice.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT&gt; &lt;P&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You Thinking?&lt;/A&gt;"  &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-2426173757479235604?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2426173757479235604'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2426173757479235604'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/07/does-ted-kennedy-deserve-his-extended.html' title='Does Ted Kennedy deserve his extended cancer care?'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-2663345512350364989</id><published>2009-07-21T10:13:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-21T10:15:40.255-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Obama Admits He's "Not Familiar" With House Bill</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;From the Heritage Foundation, July 21,  2009:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;With the public's trust in his handling of health  care tanking (50%-44% of Americans disapprove), the White House has launched a  new phase of its strategy designed to pass Obamacare: all Obama, all the time.  As part of that effort, Obama hosted a conference call with leftist bloggers  urging them to pressure Congress to pass his health plan as soon as  possible.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;During the call, a blogger from Maine said he kept  running into an Investors Business Daily article that claimed Section 102 of the  House health legislation would outlaw private insurance. He asked: "Is this  true? Will people be able to keep their insurance and will insurers be able to  write new policies even though H.R. 3200 is passed?" President Obama replied:  "You know, I have to say that I am not familiar with the provision you are  talking about." (quote begins at 17:10)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;This is a truly disturbing admission by the  President especially considering that later in the call, Obama promises yet  again: "If you have health insurance, and you like it, and you have a doctor  that you like, then you can keep it. Period." How can Obama keep making this  promise if he is not familiar with the health legislation that is being written  in Congress? Details matter.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;We are familiar with the passage IBD sites, and as  we wrote last week, the House bill does not outright outlaw private individual  health insurance, but it does effectively regulate it out of existence. The  House bill does allow private insurance to be sold, but only  "Exchange-participating health benefits plans." In order to qualify as an  "Exchange-participating health benefits plan," all health insurance plans must  conform to a slew of new regulations, including community rating and guaranteed  issue. These will all send the cost of private individual health insurance  skyrocketing. Furthermore, all these new regulations would not apply just to  individual insurance plans, but to all insurance plans. So the House bill will  also drive up the cost of your existing employer coverage as well. Until, of  course, it becomes so expensive that your company makes the perfectly economical  decision to dump you into the government plan.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;President Obama may not care to study how many  people will lose their current health insurance if his plan becomes law, but  like most Americans, we do. That is why we partnered with the Lewin Group to  study how many Americans would be forced into the government "option" under the  House health plan. Here is what we found:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;UL&gt;   &lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Approximately 103 million people would be covered    under the new public plan and as a consequence about 83.4 million people would    lose their private insurance. This would represent a 48.4 percent reduction in    the number of people with private coverage.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;   &lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;About 88.1 million workers would see their current    private, employer-sponsored health plan go away and would be shifted to the    public plan.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;   &lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Yearly premiums for the typical American with    private coverage could go up by as much as $460 per privately insured person,    as a result of increased cost-shifting stemming from a public plan modeled on    Medicare.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;It is truly frightening that the President of the  United States is pressuring Congress in an all out media blitz to pass  legislation that he flatly admits he has not read and is not familiar with.  President Obama owes it to the Americans people to stop making promises about  what his health plan will and will not do until he has read it, and can properly  defend it in public, to his own supporters.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You  Thinking?&lt;/A&gt;" &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-2663345512350364989?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2663345512350364989'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2663345512350364989'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/07/obama-admits-hes-not-familiar-with.html' title='Obama Admits He&apos;s &quot;Not Familiar&quot; With House Bill'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-3371999042189725728</id><published>2009-07-18T16:20:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-18T16:21:14.268-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Their Own Medicine</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;As the president pushes for a new health care  entitlement, one has to ask, is he willing to&amp;nbsp;participate in&amp;nbsp;the same  benefits that he espouses for the rest of America?&amp;nbsp; Are the members of  congress willing to settle for an imposed&amp;nbsp;medical system run by  bureaucrats?&amp;nbsp; Check out &lt;A  href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124786946165760369.html#mod=rss_opinion_main"&gt;this  article&lt;/A&gt; in the Wall Street Journal for answers that should be obvious to  all, but are ignored by the oblivious who support the adoption of such a  system.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; In the health debate,    liberals sing Hari Krishnas to the "public option" -- a new federal insurance    program like Medicare -- but if it's good enough for the middle class, then    surely it's good enough for the political class too? As it happens, more than    a few Democrats disagree.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; On Tuesday, the Senate    health committee voted 12-11 in favor of a two-page amendment courtesy of    Republican Tom Coburn that would require all Members and their staffs to    enroll in any new government-run health plan. Yet all Democrats -- with the    exceptions of acting chairman Chris Dodd, Barbara Mikulski and Ted Kennedy via    proxy -- voted nay.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; In other words, Sherrod    Brown and Sheldon Whitehouse won't themselves join a plan that "will offer    benefits that are as good as those available through private insurance plans    -- or better," as the Ohio and Rhode Island liberals put it in a recent op-ed.    And even a self-described socialist like Vermont's Bernie Sanders, who    supports a government-only system, wouldn't sign himself up.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Of course, they also    qualify now for generous Congressional coverage. Most Americans won't have the    same choice. Some will be transferred to the new entitlement as it uses its    taxpayer bankroll to dominate insurance markets. Others work for businesses    that will find it easier to dump their policies and move employees to the    federal rolls. Democrats also know that the public option will try to control    health spending by squeezing payments made to doctors and hospitals, and by    not paying for treatments that Washington decides are too expensive, which    will result in inferior care.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; No doubt Mr. Dodd    acceded to the Coburn amendment to blunt such objections, and in any case    he'll strip it out later in some backroom. Judd Gregg was the only GOP Senator    to oppose it, on humanitarian grounds. As he told us in an interview, the    public option "will be so bad that I don't think anyone should be forced to    join."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Read that last line again; it should give you pause  as you consider your vote in the last election.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You  Thinking?&lt;/A&gt;" &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-3371999042189725728?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/3371999042189725728'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/3371999042189725728'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/07/their-own-medicine.html' title='Their Own Medicine'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-27828788985559978</id><published>2009-07-17T10:49:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-17T10:52:10.132-04:00</updated><title type='text'>New Ad from www.OurCountryPAC.org</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="white-space: pre; "&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;object width="445" height="364"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PWFb1Yvlem4&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;amp;border=1"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PWFb1Yvlem4&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="445" height="364"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"   style="font-family:arial;font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13px;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/a&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-27828788985559978?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/27828788985559978'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/27828788985559978'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/07/new-ad-from-wwwourcountrypacorg.html' title='New Ad from www.OurCountryPAC.org'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-8847711826205671709</id><published>2009-07-14T12:34:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-14T12:43:29.135-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Rep Grayson to IG Coleman: I am Shocked!</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Rep. Alan Grayson asks the Federal Reserve Inspector General about the trillions of dollars lent or spent by the Federal Reserve and where it went, and the trillions of off balance sheet obligations. Inspector General Elizabeth Coleman responds that the IG does not know and is not tracking where this money is.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="white-space: pre; "&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;object width="445" height="364"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PXlxBeAvsB8&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;amp;border=1"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PXlxBeAvsB8&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="445" height="364"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="white-space: pre; "&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="white-space: pre; "&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;The Bloomberg Article mentioned is &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=washingtonstory&amp;amp;sid=aGq2B3XeGKok"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;HERE&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="white-space: pre; "&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;The website of the Office of Inspector General is &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/oig/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;HERE&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"   style="font-family:arial;font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13px; white-space: pre;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"   style="font-family:arial;font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13px; white-space: pre;"&gt;"&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You Thinking?&lt;/a&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-8847711826205671709?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/8847711826205671709'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/8847711826205671709'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/07/rep-grayson-to-ig-coleman-i-am-shocked.html' title='Rep Grayson to IG Coleman: I am Shocked!'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-2545170912074077176</id><published>2009-07-13T00:42:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-13T00:45:57.095-04:00</updated><title type='text'>We The People Stimulus Plan</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="white-space: pre; "&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;object width="580" height="360"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jeYscnFpEyA&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;amp;border=1"&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jeYscnFpEyA&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="580" height="360"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="white-space: pre; "&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="white-space: pre; "&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;"&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/a&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-2545170912074077176?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2545170912074077176'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2545170912074077176'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/07/we-people-stimulous-plan.html' title='We The People Stimulus Plan'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-6117197017449355221</id><published>2009-07-08T11:34:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-08T11:34:34.877-04:00</updated><title type='text'>A Tangled Web, Part II</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;A  href="http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell070809.php3"&gt;Thomas Sowell&lt;/A&gt;  points out the problems inherent in multi-culturalistic interpretations of law,  especially by the lawyers who fill the federal judiciary.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Much of the backlog of cases in our over-burdened    courts has been created by the courts themselves, with adventurous judicial    "interpretations" of laws that leave a large gray area of uncertainty around    even the most plainly written legislation. Lawyers of course fish in these    troubled waters, creating much needless litigation, but it is judges who have    troubled the waters in the first place.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Nowhere is this more true than in civil rights    cases. Since the Constitution of the United States and the Civil Rights Act of    1964 both decree equal treatment for all, there should not be nearly as much    basis for litigation in civil rights cases as there is - at least not in cases    where the facts are well known and undisputed, as in the recent New Haven    firefighters' case that made it all the way up to the Supreme    Court.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;What was it that required three different levels    of federal courts to try to figure out whether what actually happened was or    was not racial discrimination - with a decision finally being reached by the    narrowest possible margin of 5 to 4 in the Supreme Court?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;At the heart of much of this legal complexity and    moral angst is a judge-made theory that a "disparate impact" of any job    requirement on different groups is evidence of discrimination.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;With two very different theories of what    constitutes job discrimination - either different treatment or different    outcomes - it is no wonder that courts have tied themselves into knots trying    to figure out whether a particular case shows racial discrimination, even when    the facts are known and plain.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;The same notion - and the same confusion -    applies in many other situations. If a higher proportion of blacks than whites    get turned down for mortgage loans, then that too has been taken as evidence    of racial discrimination.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;It doesn't matter if blacks and whites are    different on innumerable factors that go into mortgage loan decisions, as are    Hispanics or Asian Americans as well.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;All these groups have different credit scores,    different incomes and many other differences. Why is it surprising that they    have different loan approval rates? While the issue is often posed in terms of    whites versus non-whites, whites also get turned down for mortgage loans more    often than Asian Americans, who usually have higher credit scores than    whites.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Only the underlying dogma that different outcomes    for different groups are evidence of discrimination makes this an issue - and    a source of unending controversy and polarization.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;It is not that judges are incapable of seeing    through the intellectual flaw in the "disparate impact" dogma. But that dogma    is too central to efforts at social engineering to be given up for the sake of    mere logic or facts.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;That is why courts split along ideological fault    lines in cases like the New Haven firefighters' case, where the crucial facts    are not even in dispute. The only real dispute is over whether a test is    automatically biased if different groups pass it at different rates.    Apparently the groups themselves cannot possibly be different, according to    "disparate impact" theory.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Facts play a very small role in such issues -    including the facts as to whether social engineering - especially a lowering    of standards for blacks - actually helps blacks on net balance. But empirical    studies indicate that black students do better at colleges and universities    where their qualifications are similar to those of the other students at those    institutions and worse where they are admitted with wide disparities in    qualifications.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Where in fact have blacks been most successful?    Sports and entertainment come to mind immediately. These are areas where    blacks have to meet the same standards as anybody else.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;If Derek Jeter swings at three pitches and    misses, he is out, just like any white ballplayer. If people stop watching    Oprah Winfrey's program, it will get cancelled, just like anybody    else's.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;The biggest beneficiaries from the "disparate    impact" dogma are those who claim to be helping minorities. They benefit by    feeling noble, winning votes or attracting money. The actual consequences for    blacks - or for the polarization of American society - seems to be of little    concern.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What  Were You Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-6117197017449355221?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6117197017449355221'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6117197017449355221'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/07/tangled-web-part-ii.html' title='A Tangled Web, Part II'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-8856508646773196262</id><published>2009-07-08T11:17:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-08T11:18:25.904-04:00</updated><title type='text'>A Tangled Web</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Thomas Sowell continues to shine the light of  reason on the folly of judicial activism in &lt;A  href="http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell070709.php3"&gt;this July 7  column&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;While the recent Supreme Court decision in the    New Haven firefighters' case will be welcome news to those who don't think    that a gross injustice is O.K. when those on the receiving end are white, the    reasoning behind the 5 to 4 decision is a painful reminder that the law is    still tangled in a web of assumptions, evasions and contradictions when it    comes to racial issues.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Nor have these problems been clarified with the    passage of time. On the contrary, the growing complexity and murkiness of    civil rights law over the years recalls the painful saying: "Oh, what a    tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;The original Civil Rights Act of 1964 was very    straightforward in forbidding discrimination. But, even before that Act was    passed, there were already people demanding more than equality of treatment.    Some wanted equality of end results, some wanted restitution for past wrongs,    and some just wanted as much as they could get.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Opponents of the Civil Rights Act said that it    would lead to racial quotas and reverse discrimination. Advocates of the Act    not only denied this, they wrote the language of the law in a way designed to    explicitly prevent such things. But judges, over the years, have "interpreted"    the Civil Rights Act to mean what its opponents said it would mean, rather    than what its advocates put into the plain language of the    legislation.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;A key notion that has created unending mischief,    from its introduction by the Supreme Court in 1971 to the current    firefighters' case, is that of "disparate impact." Any employment requirement    that one racial or ethnic group meets far more often than another is said to    have a "disparate impact" and is considered to be evidence of racial    discrimination.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;In other words, if group X doesn't pass a test    nearly as often as group Y, then there is something wrong with the test,    according to this reasoning or lack of reasoning. This implicitly assumes that    there cannot be any great difference between the two groups in the skills,    talents or efforts required.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;That notion is the grand dogma of our time - an    idea for which no evidence is asked or given, and an idea that no amount of    contradictory evidence can change in the minds of the true believers, or in    the rhetoric of ideologues and opportunists.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Trying to reconcile that dogma with the principle    of equal treatment for all has led courts into feats of higher metaphysics    that the Medieval Scholastics could be proud of.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;The dogma survives because it is politically    useful, not because it has met any test of facts. Innumerable facts against it    can be found around the world and down through history.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;All sorts of groups in all sorts of countries    have been demonstrably better than other groups at particular things, whether    economic, intellectual, political or military. This fact is so blatant that    only people with great cleverness can manage to deny the obvious. That    cleverness is what creates the tangled web of confusion that has plagued civil    right cases for decades.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Does anybody seriously doubt that blacks usually    play basketball better than whites? Does anybody seriously doubt that the    leading cameras and lenses in world have long been produced by Germans and    Japanese? Or that Jews have been over-represented among the top performers in    various intellectual fields?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Many groups whose performances have greatly    outstripped the performances of others in a particular field have often been    in no position to discriminate, even when the disparities have been far    greater than those between blacks and whites in the United  States.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;In a number of countries, powerless minorities    have so outperformed the dominant majority that group preferences and quotas    have been instituted to favor the majority group that has otherwise been    unable to compete. This has happened in Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Nigeria, and    Fiji, among other places. Before World War II, quotas to benefit the majority    were common in a number of European universities, where Jewish students    outperformed others.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;It is not stupidity, but ideology and politics,    which allow the "disparate impact" dogma to create a tangled web of deception    in even the highest levels of our legal system. The recent Supreme Court's    decision in the New Haven firefighters' case was a rare example of sanity    prevailing, even if only by a vote of 5 to 4.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What  Were You Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-8856508646773196262?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/8856508646773196262'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/8856508646773196262'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/07/tangled-web.html' title='A Tangled Web'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-1993327825327588769</id><published>2009-07-05T23:51:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-06T00:09:25.857-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Our Judeo-Christian Nation</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="white-space: pre;"&gt;Congressman Randy Forbes asks the questions "Did America ever consider itself a &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="white-space: pre;"&gt;Judeo-Christian nation?" and "If America was once a Judeo-Christian nation, when &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="white-space: pre;"&gt;did it cease to be?" on the floor of the US House.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="white-space: pre; "&gt;&lt;object width="445" height="364"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dpQOCvthw-o&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;amp;border=1"&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dpQOCvthw-o&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="445" height="364"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style=" white-space: pre;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;What Were You  Thinking?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-1993327825327588769?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1993327825327588769'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1993327825327588769'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/07/our-judeo-christian-nation.html' title='Our Judeo-Christian Nation'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-1038750629102133868</id><published>2009-06-29T07:25:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-29T09:26:44.398-04:00</updated><title type='text'>8 GOP Votes Paved Way for "Cap And Tax" Bill</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;President Barack Obama and House Speaker Nancy  Pelosi scored a major victory with the House's approval of a landmark climate  bill -- thanks to a little help from a handful of Republicans.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Friday's vote was 219-212. The legislation was  supported by 211 Democrats and eight aisle-crossing GOP members: Reps. Mary Bono  (Calif.), Michael Castle (Del.), Mark Kirk (Ill.), Leonard Lance (N.J.), Frank  LoBiondo (N.J.), John McHugh (N.Y.), David Reichert (Wash.) and Christopher  Smith (N.J.). Forty-four Democrats voted against the bill, making the eight GOP  votes all the more crucial.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"This is the biggest job-killing bill that's ever  been on the floor of the House of Representatives. Right here, this bill," House  Minority Leader John Boehner said after the vote. "And I don't think that's what  the American people want."&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;The 1,200-plus-page bill now goes to the Senate,  where it faces an uncertain future.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;According to The Associated Press, the  "cap-and-trade" legislation places the first national limits on emissions of  heat-trapping gases from major sources like power plants, refineries and  factories. It requires:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;UL&gt;   &lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;An 17 percent cut in greenhouse gas    emissions by 2020.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;   &lt;LI&gt;&amp;nbsp;An 83 percent cut in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.&lt;/LI&gt;   &lt;LI&gt;&amp;nbsp;That 20 percent of all electricity in the United States be generated    by renewable sources and/or more efficient methods by 2020.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;As written, the bill will cost American households  an estimated $175 a year by 2020, according to the Congressional Budget  Office.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Many Republicans refer to the legislation as a  "national energy tax."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;A  href="http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/climate_bill_republicans/2009/06/28/229467.html?s=al&amp;amp;promo_code=825B-1"&gt;©  2009 Newsmax&lt;/A&gt;. All rights reserved.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You  Thinking?&lt;/A&gt;" &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-1038750629102133868?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1038750629102133868'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1038750629102133868'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/06/8-gop-votes-paved-way-for-cap-and-tax.html' title='8 GOP Votes Paved Way for &quot;Cap And Tax&quot; Bill'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-6362919899086961456</id><published>2009-06-13T15:18:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-13T15:18:37.329-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The Market Driven Church</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Udo W. Middelmann has written a book entitled  &lt;EM&gt;&lt;A  href="http://www.amazon.com/Market-Driven-Church-Worldly-Influence-Culture/dp/1581345097/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1244918201&amp;amp;sr=8-4"&gt;The  Market Driven Church&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;, subtitled &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;EM&gt;The  Worldly Influence of Modern Culture on the Church in America&lt;/EM&gt;.&amp;nbsp;Having  grown up &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;in post-W.W.II Europe, he brings a fresh  perspective to a discussion of the church in &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2  face=Arial&gt;particular, and our postmodern, post-Christian culture in  general.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Chapter 3 is titled Lemonade with Too Much Water.  Middelmann discusses the many &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;changes within  society and the church, and suggests that where the church once &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT  size=2 face=Arial&gt;influenced society, the reverse has now become the predominant  modality.&amp;nbsp; After &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;pointing out problems both  on the left and right, liberal and conservative, and &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2  face=Arial&gt;positing a religion that has become more personal than public ("The  personalization &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;of Christianity weakens the  emphasis on the need to bow before the reality of God, &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2  face=Arial&gt;our sin, and Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.") And then these very  timely &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;comments:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Our age has largely replaced real discussions of    theological, philosophical, and &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;cultural    content with "personal" testimony, anecdotal experience, and private    &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;views.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;and this:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; External factors have also    contributed to the decline in the holding of truth.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2    face=Arial&gt;Even agreement that we have the Word of God in the Bible does not    prevent modern &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;notions of what is true from    doing great harm.&amp;nbsp; One of these is the modern concept &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2    face=Arial&gt;of democracy, which has affected our understanding of what is    true.&amp;nbsp; Once it was &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;held that submitting    all matters to the consent of the governed required an &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2    face=Arial&gt;acceptance of a corresponding responsibility by the voters.&amp;nbsp;    They must be critical, &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;informed, moral, and    accountable.&amp;nbsp; Where this is not the case, democracy will no &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT    size=2 face=Arial&gt;longer bring an educated and moral consent.&amp;nbsp; Law will    follow a mathematical &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;win/lose situation.&amp;nbsp;    Numbers can win a count, but not always an argument.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Majorities do not by necessity    have moral integrity.&amp;nbsp; They only tell us the size, &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2    face=Arial&gt;not the character, of the followers. &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2    face=Arial&gt;The majority/minority relation tells us something numerical only.    Without an &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;outside definition of what is good,    right, and beautiful, democracy will only &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2    face=Arial&gt;indicate what is more or less accepted.&amp;nbsp; In the end, what    separates the minority &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;from the acceptable is a    matter of numbers, not greater wisdom, moral rectitude, &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2    face=Arial&gt;etc.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;I think Mr. Middelmann has hit the nail directly  upon the head. I think we can, in light of the current state of our country,  make more than a few inferences from and about our culture.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;UL&gt;   &lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;We have become less interested in knowing the    truth about issues than in winning the day with whatever argument we have    chosen to accept.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;   &lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Many of us accept and hold to a position not    because we've studied it and found it to be true and in accord with reality    but because it "feels right" to us.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;   &lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;We have as a society become increasingly crass and    mean-spirited about those with whom we disagree.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;   &lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;The people we choose to serve us in public office    are increasingly less concerned with issues truth,&amp;nbsp;of right and wrong,    but are more interested in remaining in office for personal power and pursuit    of their own private agenda.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;   &lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;In these pursuits, numbers suit them better than    do the correctness of their issues&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;   &lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Likewise, an aroused but basically ignorant public    is more easily swayed by the use of rhetoric.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Ron Kohlin &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt; &lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp; My &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;A  href="http://www.facebook.com/people/Ron-Kohlin/1581300061"&gt;&lt;FONT size=2  face=Arial&gt;Facebook&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt; Page &lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;A  href="http://kohlin.com/"&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Ron's Rec Room&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;FONT  size=2 face=Arial&gt; website &lt;BR&gt;"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;A  href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;What Were You  Thinking?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;" &lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp; My &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;A  href="http://ronsrecroom.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;FONT size=2  face=Arial&gt;Proton&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt; Blog &lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp; Our  &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;A href="http://ronanita-alaska.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;FONT size=2  face=Arial&gt;Alaska Trip&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;  Blog&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-6362919899086961456?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6362919899086961456'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6362919899086961456'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/06/market-driven-church.html' title='The Market Driven Church'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-487312079986529084</id><published>2009-06-09T11:30:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-09T11:32:09.327-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Judicial Activism</title><content type='html'>&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/mrz060109dAPR20090530024658.jpg" style="text-decoration: none;"&gt;&lt;img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 462px; height: 350px;" src="http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/mrz060109dAPR20090530024658.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div&gt;"&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You Thinking?&lt;/a&gt;"&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-487312079986529084?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/487312079986529084/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/06/judicial-activism.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/487312079986529084'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/487312079986529084'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/06/judicial-activism.html' title='Judicial Activism'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-4046202458048196822</id><published>2009-06-07T20:49:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-08T08:56:32.960-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Out of Context, Part III</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;In &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell060409.php3"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;his most recent  column&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; about Obama's nominee for the Supreme Court, Dr. Thomas Sowell  compares the 'housing projects' of his (and of Sonya Sotomayor) childhood with  those we know today.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;blockquote style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir="ltr"&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;As part of the biographical    preoccupation with Judge Sonia Sotomayor's past, the New York Times of May    31st had a feature story on the various New York housing projects in which she    and other well-known people grew up - including Whoopi Goldberg, Kareem    Abdul-Jabbar, Thelonious Monk and Mike Tyson.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;There was a map of New York    City and dots pin-pointing the location of the project in which each celebrity    grew up. As an old New Yorker, I was struck by the fact that not one of the 20    celebrities shown grew up in a housing project in Harlem!&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;The housing projects in which    they grew up were different in another and more fundamental way. As the New    York Times put it: "These were not the projects of idle, stinky elevators, of    gang-controlled stairwells where drug deals go down." In other words, these    were public housing projects of an earlier era, when such places were very    different from what we associate with the words "housing project"    today.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;Just the reference to unlocked    doors on the apartments there, so that children could more easily visit    playmates in nearby apartments on Saturday mornings to watch television,    creates an image that must seem like something out of another world to those    familiar only with the housing projects of today.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;There were standards for    getting into the projects of those days and, if you didn't live up to those    standards, they put you out. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar was quoted as saying, "When    kids played on the grass, their parent would get a warning." That seems almost    quaint when you think of what has gone on in the housing projects of a later    era.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;Since there has been so much    talk of putting some of Sonia Sotomayor's inflammatory words "in context,"    perhaps we should put her personal life in context, if the media insist on    making her personal life a factor in her nomination to the Supreme Court.    While she grew up in a public housing project, the words "housing project" in    that era did not mean anything like the housing projects of  today.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;A relative of mine lived in    one of the housing projects back then - and we were proud of him, as well as    glad for him, because such places were for upright citizens in those days -    working class people with steady jobs and good behavior. Clever intellectuals    had not yet taught us to be "non-judgmental" about misbehavior or to make    excuses for vandalism and crime.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;While Sonia Sotomayor was not    born with a silver spoon in her mouth, let's not make her someone who rose    from such depths as those conjured up by the words "housing projects" today.    It is bad enough that biographical considerations carry such weight in    considerations of nominees for the Supreme Court. But, if biography must be    elaborated, let it at least be done "in context."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;It has always made me a little    uneasy when generous well-wishers have discussed my educational background as    if it was something almost miraculous that I came out of the schools in Harlem    and went on to Ivy League institutions. But any number of other people did    exactly the same thing.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;The Harlem schools of that era    were no more like the Harlem schools of today than the housing projects of    that era were like today's housing projects. They had classes grouped by    ability and, if you were serious about getting a good education, you could get    into one of the classes for kids who were serious and receive an education    that would prepare you to go on in life.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;There is a lot to ponder about    why both the schools and the housing projects degenerated so much after the    bright ideas of the 1960s intelligentsia spread throughout society, leaving    social havoc in their wake.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;Too many people who rose to    where they are today because of a foundation of traditional values have become    enthralled by the very different ideas prevalent in the elite intellectual    circles to which they moved. Judge Sotomayor seems to be one of those, with    her ideas about race and the policy-making role of judges.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;      &lt;/span&gt;It is bad enough that so many    of those "advanced" ideas have undermined for others the foundation that Sonia    Sotomayor had as she grew up, despite being raised in a home with a modest    income. There is no need to let her use the Supreme Court to destroy more of    those traditional American values.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;What  Were You Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-4046202458048196822?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/4046202458048196822/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/06/out-of-context-part-iii.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/4046202458048196822'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/4046202458048196822'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/06/out-of-context-part-iii.html' title='Out of Context, Part III'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-4600163027203383078</id><published>2009-06-07T20:25:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-07T20:29:58.371-04:00</updated><title type='text'>"We're Sorry..."</title><content type='html'>&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/mrz060509dAPR20090605031427.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 462px; height: 350px;" src="http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/mrz060509dAPR20090605031427.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;"&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You Thinking?&lt;/a&gt;"&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-4600163027203383078?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/4600163027203383078/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/06/were-sorry.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/4600163027203383078'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/4600163027203383078'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/06/were-sorry.html' title='&quot;We&apos;re Sorry...&quot;'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-586535659766731881</id><published>2009-06-04T08:57:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-04T08:59:35.220-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Free Health Care</title><content type='html'>&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.creators.com/editorial_cartoons/21/8604_image.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 589px; height: 400px;" src="http://www.creators.com/editorial_cartoons/21/8604_image.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Thanks a Lot!!&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;"&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/a&gt;?"&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-586535659766731881?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/586535659766731881/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/06/free-health-care.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/586535659766731881'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/586535659766731881'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/06/free-health-care.html' title='Free Health Care'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-7986691448676191613</id><published>2009-06-03T15:22:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-03T15:22:33.480-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Out of Context, Part II</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;A  href="http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell060309.php3"&gt;June 3rd brings  another fact-filled, hard-hitting column&lt;/A&gt; from Thomas Sowell on 'the context'  of Sonya Sotomayor's racial comments.&amp;nbsp; We have to ask, is your personal  story of more value than mine? Why?&amp;nbsp; Sotomayor didn't thank the government  for it's affirmative action programs when she accepted the nomination, but  implies that she will support such programs for people like herself.&amp;nbsp; Is  that the function of Supreme Court judges?&amp;nbsp; Are they to decide cases based  on the law, or are they to make decisions based on their own personal  biases?&amp;nbsp; Is a liberal bias of more value than a conservative bias?&amp;nbsp;  Which is true to the constitution?&amp;nbsp; What about the ideas of racial and  sexual diversity - do these ideas bring us closer as Americans, or do they drive  wedges between people?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; As the mainstream media    circles the wagons around Judge Sonia Sotomayor, to protect her from the    consequences of her own words and deeds, its main arguments are distractions    from the issue at hand. A CNN reporter, for example, got all worked up because    Rush Limbaugh had used the word "racist" to describe the judge's    words.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Since it has been repeated    like a mantra that Judge Sotomayor's words have been "taken out of context,"    let us look at Rush Limbaugh in context. The cold fact is that Rush Limbaugh    has not been nominated to sit on the highest court in the land, with a    lifetime appointment, to have the lives and liberties of 300 million Americans    in his hands.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Whatever you may think about    his choice of words, those words and the ideas behind them do not change the    law of the land. The words and actions of Supreme Court justices do. Anyone    who doesn't like what Rush Limbaugh says can simply turn off the radio or    change the station. But you cannot escape the consequences of Supreme Court    decisions. Nor will your children or grandchildren.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; What does it say about a    nominee to the Supreme Court that the most that her defenders can say in her    defense is that her critics used words that her defenders don't    like?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; What does it say about her    qualifications to be on the Supreme Court when her supporters' biggest talking    points are that she had to struggle to rise in the world?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Bonnie and Clyde had to    struggle. Al Capone had to struggle. The only President of the United States    who was forced to resign for his misdeeds - Richard Nixon - had to struggle.    For that matter, Adolf Hitler had to struggle! There is no evidence that    struggle automatically makes you a better person.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Sometimes, instead of making    you appreciative of a society in which someone born at the bottom can rise to    the top, it leaves you embittered that you had to spend years struggling, and    resentful of those who were born into circumstances where the easy way to the    top was open to them.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Much in the past of Sonia    Sotomayor, and of the president who nominated her, suggests such resentments.    Both have a history of connections with people who promoted resentments    against American society. La Raza ("the race") was Judge Sotomayor's Jeremiah    Wright. If context is important, then look at that context.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Sonia Sotomayor has, in both    her words and in her decision as a judge to dismiss out of hand the appeal of    white firefighters who had been discriminated against, betrayed a racism that    is no less racism because it is directed against different people than the old    racism of the past.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The code word for the new    racism is "diversity." The Constitution of the United States says nothing    about diversity and the Constitution is what a judge is supposed to pay    attention to, not the prevailing buzzwords of the times.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; What the Constitution says is    "equal protection of the laws" for all Americans - and that is not taken out    of context. People have put their lives on the line to make those words a    reality. Now all of that is to be made to vanish into thin air by saying the    magic word "diversity."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The landmark Civil Rights Act    of 1964, like the Constitution, proclaimed equal rights for all, not special    rights for those for whom judges have "empathy."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; When the Civil Rights Act of    1964 was being debated in Congress, its opponents claimed that it would lead    to discrimination against white people. Its supporters declared that it meant    no such thing and added new provisions to make sure that it meant no such    thing. That was the law that was passed.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; It was not the law, but the    judges, who changed equal rights into special rights and thereby set the stage    for the new mantra of "diversity" that trumps equal rights. Diversity was    Judge Sotomayor's rationale for going along with the denial of equal rights    for white firefighters in Connecticut.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; When all else fails,    supporters of Judge Sotomayor say that she is Hispanic and a woman, and that    it would be politically dangerous to deny her a place on the Supreme Court.    This is as much an insult to the intelligence of Hispanic and female voters as    it is to the Constitution of the United States and to those who put their    lives on the line for equal rights.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What  Were You Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?".&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-7986691448676191613?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/7986691448676191613/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/06/out-of-context-part-ii.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7986691448676191613'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7986691448676191613'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/06/out-of-context-part-ii.html' title='Out of Context, Part II'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-6466180181276272623</id><published>2009-06-03T15:03:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-03T15:03:36.293-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Out of Context</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;A  href="http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell060209.php3"&gt;On June 2nd&lt;/A&gt;,  Thomas Sowell penned yet another column regarding Barack Obama's nominee for the  Supreme Court.&amp;nbsp; Pointing out the hypocritical double standard employed by  the left in supporting Ms. Sotomayor, Mr. Sowell makes cogent material points  rather than employing ad hominum attacks..&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; In Washington, the clearer a    statement is, the more certain it is to be followed by a "clarification" when    people realize what was said. The clearly racist comments made by Judge Sonia    Sotomayor on the Berkeley campus in 2001 have forced the spinmasters to resort    to their last-ditch excuse, that it was "taken out of context."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If that line is used during    Judge Sotomayor's Senate confirmation hearings, someone should ask her to    explain just what those words mean when taken in context.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; What could such statements    possibly mean - in any context - other than the new and fashionable racism of    our time, rather than the old-fashioned racism of earlier times? Racism has    never done this country any good, and it needs to be fought against, not put    under new management for different groups.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Looked at in the context of    Judge Sotomayor's voting to dismiss the appeal of white firefighters who were    denied the promotions they had earned by passing an exam, because not enough    minorities passed that exam to create "diversity," her words in Berkeley seem    to match her actions on the judicial bench in the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals    all too well.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The Supreme Court of the    United States thought that case was important enough to hear it, even though    the three-judge panel on which Judge Sotomayor served gave it short shrift in    less than a page. Apparently the famous "empathy" that President Obama says a    judge should have does not apply to white males in Judge Sotomayor's    court.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The very idea that a judge's    "life experiences" should influence judicial decisions is as absurd as it is    dangerous.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; It is dangerous because    citizens are supposed to obey the law, which means they must know what the law    is in advance - and nobody can know in advance what the "life experiences" of    whatever judge they might appear before will happen to be.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; t is absurd because it flies    in the face of the facts. It was a fellow Puerto Rican judge on the 2nd    Circuit Court of Appeals - Jose Cabranes - who rebuked his judicial colleagues    for the cavalier way they dismissed the white firefighters' case.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; On the Supreme Court, the    justice whose life story is most like that of Sonia Sotomayor - Clarence    Thomas - has a very different judicial philosophy from hers.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The clever people in the media    and elsewhere are saying that "inevitably" one's background influences how one    feels about issues. Even if that were true, judges are not supposed to decide    cases based on their personal feelings.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes    said that he "loathed" many of the people in whose favor he voted on the    Supreme Court. Obviously, he had feelings. But he also had the good sense and    integrity to rule on the basis of the law, not his feelings.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Laws are made for the benefit    of the citizens, not for the self-indulgences of judges. Making excuses for    such self-indulgences and calling them "inevitable" is part of the cleverness    that has eroded the rule of law and undermined respect for the    law.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Something else is said to be    "inevitable" by the clever people. That is the confirmation of Sonia Sotomayor    to the Supreme Court. But it was only a year and a half ago that Hillary    Clinton's winning the Democratic Party's nomination for president was    considered "inevitable."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The Republicans certainly do    not have the votes to stop Judge Sotomayor from being confirmed - if all the    Democrats vote for her. But that depends on what the people say. It looked    like a done deal a couple of years ago when an amnesty bill for illegal aliens    was sailing through the Senate with bipartisan support. But public outrage    brought that political steamroller to a screeching halt.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Nothing is inevitable in a    democracy unless the public lets the political spinmasters and media talking    heads lead them around by the nose.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The real question is whether    the Republican Senators have the guts to alert the public to the dangers of    putting this kind of judge on the highest court in the land, so that they will    at least have some chance of stopping the next one that comes    along.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; It would be considered a    disgrace if an umpire in a baseball game let his "empathy" determine whether a    pitch was called a ball or strike. Surely we should accept nothing less from a    judge.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What  Were You Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-6466180181276272623?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/6466180181276272623/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/06/out-of-context.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6466180181276272623'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6466180181276272623'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/06/out-of-context.html' title='Out of Context'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-686576112895136254</id><published>2009-06-02T10:46:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-02T10:46:55.790-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Five Character Flaws...</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;John Hawkins writes an interesting article in  Townhall.com today.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Addressing the state of our American Culture, the  article is titled &lt;EM&gt;Five Character Flaws That Are Destroying America's  Future&lt;/EM&gt;.&amp;nbsp; I wonder if these attributes are found in the peoples of  other countries as well?&amp;nbsp; I suspect so; they're more likely the result of  the post-Christian, Postmodern philosophy that infects the entire  world.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;1) Lack Of Personal    Responsibility:&lt;/STRONG&gt; As a society, we encourage a "victimhood mentality"    and an overweening government that never met an issue it didn't want to dive    into with both feet; so we shouldn't be surprised that so many Americans    expect to be rewarded for failure.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If GM fails, we've got to step    in and keep it afloat. If people snuck into this country illegally, we can't    be so hardhearted as to obey the law and deport them! If you bought a house    you couldn't afford, you shouldn't be penalized for that when the market takes    a bad turn. If you bought a blender, tried to start it in your bathtub, and    were nearly electrocuted -- that's not your fault! The manufacturers should    have put a warning sticker on it.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; We're descended from pioneer    stock. Our ancestors explored, conquered, and tamed a continent. They couldn't    rely on the police to show up if an Indian raiding party showed up at their    isolated cabin at 3 AM. There was no school lunch program on the Oregon Trail.    If your buggy whip company was going out of business because of those new    fangled auto-mo-biles, you didn't get 20 billion dollars in taxpayer money so    you could open up a new branch in China, you went out of business. If our    ancestors were alive, they would sneer in disdain at what a nation full of    whining babies their descendants have become.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2) Short Attention Spans:&lt;/STRONG&gt;    Perhaps because of the internet, the stunning variety of news sources, or the    complexity of modern society, we've become much less able as a people to    follow logical arguments and deal with complex messages.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; This has bled over into    Congress where they write legislation dealing with issues they don't truly    understand. That legislation is voted on by legislators who admit that they    haven't read it and it affects the lives of millions of people who were    unaware that such legislation was even being contemplated.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The problem with this is that    there are many issues in life that are too knotty to be broken down into a    soundbite or a 30 second commercial. Those affairs require more extensive    knowledge and deeper thought and consideration than can be placed on a bumper    sticker or weaved into a music video. When we lose sight of that fact, utter    disasters that have been in plain sight all along for anyone with an attention    span longer than five minutes can blindside much of the    population.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;3) Excessive Self-Esteem:&lt;/STRONG&gt;    Perhaps because we've spent decades trying to pump up the self-esteem of    children in our public schools, irregardless of whether they've done anything    to merit it, we have legions of people in our society who have an excessive    level of confidence in their beliefs and abilities.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; They're just so darn sure that    what they believe is right just by virtue of the fact they believe it.    Traditions? Codes of conduct? Religious beliefs? Customs? There's no need to    even understand why previous generations believed what they did or to question    what purpose it served. Just remember that they were racist back then and so    they couldn't have had any good ideas.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Of course, we don't look back    and say, "Gee? How did they make it without welfare, social security, or an    income tax? Why is it that they had a divorce rate that was a fraction of the    one we had today? How is it that the crime rate was so much lower? What made    the people so much more polite than they are today? If we were in the same    situation as the Founding Fathers, could our political leaders step up to the    plate and do as well?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Because we have forgotten the    mistakes that convinced our forefathers to adopt the policies and mores that    they did, in our ignorance we will be doomed to make many of those same    mistakes again.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;4) Short Term Thinking/Instant    Gratification:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Thomas Sowell once said that killing the goose that    laid the golden egg can be a viable election strategy as long as it doesn't    die until you're out of office and no one finds your prints on the murder    weapon.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; That is played out in American    politics on a daily basis where few politicians think farther ahead than the    next election. Time and time again, we have politicians advocating policies    that either bring immediate benefits or avoid short-term pain, but are    extremely harmful to the country over the long-term.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; That is primarily how    government has gotten so out of control. A problem occurs. In an effort to get    re-elected, politicians rush to create a program to "fix" it. Ten years later,    the original problem may or may not have been solved, but the program put in    place to "fix" it has caused new issues and costs five times more than it did    when it was originally put into place. However, if anyone suggests we get rid    of it, there are howls of outrage. Hence, government never shrinks and bad    programs almost never die.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;5) Immorality:&lt;/STRONG&gt; The default mode    of Hollywood is hedonism and we've been told again and again, at least since    the Clinton years, that character doesn't matter for our elected    officials.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The problem with this is that    character does matter -- quite a bit, actually.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Our leaders are corrupt to the    core -- and that's not just the ones who are in violation of our laws, which    have been crafted in order to allow staggering amounts of corruption to be    done legally. The families of politicians are given plum jobs and paid    ridiculous sums of money in order to gain influence with legislators.    Government earmarks that aid campaign contributors or family members of    Congress are common. Chrysler has even been handed over to Barack Obama's    union allies in broad daylight. Ethics have become the very last consideration    for our government and perhaps it's no surprise given the state of our    society.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Civility is dead and buried.    We have people protesting funerals and the private residences of citizens.    There are perverted gay parades in the streets of San Francisco. The most    grotesque, blasphemous, and offensive material imaginable is regularly    displayed on the internet and TV and we are drenched in sex from the time we    get up until the time we go to bed.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; As a replacement for actual    human decency and morality, we've turned to political correctness and    bloodless legalisms, neither of which is an adequate replacement for doing the    right thing because it's principled or virtuous.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The corrosive effects of this    decline are seen not just in our government, but all throughout our society in    the size of our prison population, the number of unmarried women having    children, drug use, school shootings, and even our staggering abortion    rate.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;The comments following the article are instructive,  as well. Read &lt;A  href="http://townhall.com/columnists/JohnHawkins/2009/06/02/5_character_flaws_that_are_destroying_americas_future?page=full&amp;amp;comments=true"&gt;the  article and comments HERE&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What  Were You Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-686576112895136254?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/686576112895136254/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/06/five-character-flaws.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/686576112895136254'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/686576112895136254'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/06/five-character-flaws.html' title='Five Character Flaws...'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-830135712294574612</id><published>2009-06-01T21:21:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-01T21:22:14.803-04:00</updated><title type='text'>'Empathy' In Action</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;The values of a judge with&amp;nbsp;"emapthy" is  presented by &lt;A href="http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell052709.php3"&gt;Dr.  Thomas Sowell&lt;/A&gt;. How can a judge be true to the law, and at the same  time&amp;nbsp;give special, 'empethetic'&amp;nbsp;consideration to some privileged  individuals or groups?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;It is one of the    signs of our times that so many in the media are focusing on the life story of    Judge Sonia Sotomayor, President Obama's nominee for the Supreme Court of the    United States.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; You might think that this was    some kind of popularity contest, instead of a weighty decision about someone    whose impact on the fundamental law of the nation will extend for decades    after Barack Obama has come and gone.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Much is being made of the fact    that Sonia Sotomayor had to struggle to rise in the world. But stop and    think.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If you were going to have open    heart surgery, would you want to be operated on by a surgeon who was chosen    because he had to struggle to get where he is or by the best surgeon you could    find - even if he was born with a silver spoon in his mouth and had every    advantage that money and social position could offer?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If it were you who was going    to be lying on that operating table with his heart cut open, you wouldn't give    a tinker's damn about somebody's struggle or somebody else's    privileges.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The Supreme Court of the    United States is in effect operating on the heart of our nation - the    Constitution and the statutes and government policies that all of us must live    under.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Barack Obama's repeated claim    that a Supreme Court justice should have "empathy" with various groups has    raised red flags that we ignore at our peril and at the peril of our children    and grandchildren.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; "Empathy" for particular    groups can be reconciled with "equal justice under law" - the motto over the    entrance to the Supreme Court - only with smooth words. But not in reality.    President Obama used those smooth words in introducing Judge Sotomayor but    words do not change realities.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Nothing demonstrates the fatal    dangers from judicial "empathy" more than Judge Sotomayor's decision in a 2008    case involving firemen who took an exam for promotion. After the racial mix of    those who passed that test turned out to be predominantly white, with only a    few blacks and Hispanics, the results were thrown out.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; When this action by the local    civil service authorities was taken to court and eventually reached the 2nd    Circuit Court of Appeals, Judge Sotomayor did not give the case even the    courtesy of a spelling out of the issues. She backed those who threw out the    test results. Apparently she didn't have "empathy" with those predominantly    white males who had been cheated out of promotions they had    earned.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Fellow 2nd    Circuit Court judge Jose Cabranes commented on the short shrift given to the    serious issues in this case. It so happens that he too is Hispanic, but    apparently he does not decide legal issues on the basis of "empathy" or lack    thereof.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; This was not an isolated    matter for Judge Sotomayor. Speaking at the University of California at    Berkeley in 2001, she said that the ethnicity and sex of a judge "may and will    make a difference in our judging."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Moreover, this was not    something she lamented. On the contrary, she added, "I would hope that a wise    Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not    reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that    life."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; No doubt the political    spinmasters will try to spin this to mean something innocent. But the cold    fact is that this is a poisonous doctrine for any judge, much less a justice    of the Supreme Court.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; That kind of empathy would for    all practical purposes repeal the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the    United States, which guarantees "equal protection of the laws" to all    Americans.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; What would the political    spinmasters say if some white man said that a white male would more often    reach a better conclusion than a Hispanic female?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; For those who believe in the    rule of law, Barack Obama used the words "rule of law" in introducing his    nominee. For those who take his words as gospel, even when his own actions are    directly the opposite of his words, that may be enough to let him put this    dangerous woman on the Supreme Court.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Even if her confirmation    cannot be stopped, it is important for Senators to warn of the dangers, which    will only get worse if such nominations sail through the Senate    smoothly.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"&lt;A href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What  Were You Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-830135712294574612?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/830135712294574612/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/06/empathy-in-action.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/830135712294574612'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/830135712294574612'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/06/empathy-in-action.html' title='&apos;Empathy&apos; In Action'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-1596463615978736252</id><published>2009-05-30T10:54:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-30T11:00:32.075-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Presidential Oath of Office</title><content type='html'>Each president recites the following oath, in accordance with Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."&lt;/blockquote&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html"&gt; the Constitution of the United States&lt;/a&gt;, to see what the current occupant of the Oval Office has sworn (or affirmed) to preserve, protect and defend.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You Thinking?&lt;/a&gt;"&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-1596463615978736252?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/1596463615978736252/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/presidential-oath-of-office.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1596463615978736252'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1596463615978736252'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/presidential-oath-of-office.html' title='Presidential Oath of Office'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-3946597390703645232</id><published>2009-05-30T10:33:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-30T10:38:51.840-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Sotomayor: Judges make Policy</title><content type='html'>&lt;object width="445" height="364"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/OfC99LrrM2Q&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;border=1"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/OfC99LrrM2Q&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="445" height="364"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-3946597390703645232?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/3946597390703645232/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/sotomayor-judges-make-policy.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/3946597390703645232'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/3946597390703645232'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/sotomayor-judges-make-policy.html' title='Sotomayor: Judges make Policy'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-1639669254423234262</id><published>2009-05-27T13:04:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-27T13:04:54.761-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Oath of Office for Federal Judges</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;In the United States, federal judges are required  to take not just one, but two oaths. The first oath is this:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;I, [Name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that    &lt;STRONG&gt;I will administer justice&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;without respect to    persons&lt;/STRONG&gt;, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that    &lt;STRONG&gt;I will faithfully and impartially&lt;/STRONG&gt; discharge and perform all    the duties incumbent upon me as [appointed position] under the Constitution    and laws of the United States. So help me God.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;The second oath that federal judges must take is  this:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;I, [Name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I    will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all    enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to    the same; that &lt;STRONG&gt;I take this obligation freely, without any&lt;/STRONG&gt;    &lt;STRONG&gt;mental reservation or purpose of evasion&lt;/STRONG&gt;; and that &lt;STRONG&gt;I    will&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;well and faithfully&lt;/STRONG&gt; discharge the duties of the    office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV dir=ltr&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Emphasis added; draw your own  conclusions.&amp;nbsp; Please also note that &lt;A  href="http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html"&gt;the  Constitution&lt;/A&gt; says nothing about having empathy for any particular group that  might come before the court.&amp;nbsp; It does mention the Law - which is to be  enacted by Congress and approved by the President.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV dir=ltr&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV dir=ltr&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;"&lt;A  href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You  Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-1639669254423234262?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/1639669254423234262/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/oath-of-office-for-federal-judges.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1639669254423234262'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1639669254423234262'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/oath-of-office-for-federal-judges.html' title='Oath of Office for Federal Judges'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-3147339154025929949</id><published>2009-05-27T11:05:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-27T11:05:53.913-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Waxman-Markey</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Monday's "Morning Bell" from the Heritage  Foundation:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Today the House Energy and    Commerce Committee will begin a multi-day markup on the Waxman-Markey energy    tax bill. Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA) has been busy lobbying his    own caucus for the necessary 30 votes to get the bill out of committee for    weeks, but the bill's fate is still in doubt. Considering that global warming    legislation is a cornerstone of President Barack Obama's agenda (he needs the    tax revenues to fund his other big spending priorities), why can't the Obama    administration convince their own party that their energy tax is a good deal    for the American people?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;    First let's look at the economic costs of Waxman-Markey. Waxman-Markey    attempts to limit greenhouse gas emissions by making it more expensive for    greenhouse gas emitters to operate. Instead of a direct tax on greenhouse    emissions, Waxman-Markey issues permits (mostly for free but some at a price    paid to the federal government) that allow businesses to emit greenhouse    gasses. Businesses that fail to lobby the federal government for enough    permits to cover their current emission levels will then have to buy them from    either the federal government or other businesses that have better lobbyists    in Washington, DC.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The net effect of these    permits is higher costs for businesses and consumers that emit greenhouse    gasses, the most prevalent being CO2. As then-candidate Barack Obama explained    to the San Francisco Chronicle, this policy will cause electricity prices to    "skyrocket." Since everything you consume requires energy, the higher energy    costs caused by Waxman-Markey will spread throughout the entire economy. The    Heritage Foundation's Center for Data Analysis has crunched the numbers and    found that by 2035, last week's version of Waxman-Markey would: 1) reduce    aggregate gross domestic product (GDP) by $7.4 trillion; 2) destroy 844,000    jobs on average; and 3) raise an average family's annual energy bill by    $1,500. And this week's version of the bill appears to have an even greater    catastrophic effect on the economy.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; That's a pretty steep cost. So    what do Americans get for being $7.4 trillion poorer in 2035? Other    environmental legislation has helped reduce acid rain and slow the growth of    asthma, so Waxman-Markey must offer some tangible benefits to the American    people right? Wrong. Waxman-Markey is a truly unique piece of environmental    legislation in that it does not offer a single tangible benefit to the    American people.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Global warming is just that:    global. The United States still has the largest economy in the world, but    China is now the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gasses. India also has    a rapidly growing economy and neither they, nor China, have any plans to    reduce their carbon emissions. So, using the left's own global warming theory,    how much would Waxman-Markey actually cool the earth? Climatologist Chip    Knappenberger crunched the numbers and found that even the strictest version    of Waxman-Markey would reduce projected global temperatures by just 0.044ºC by    2050. That is less than one-tenth of one degree.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; So as this week progresses,    and you hear scary story after scary story of all the hurricanes, wildfires,    and flooding that will occur because of global warming, remember this:    according to the left's own computer models Waxman-Markey would not prevent    any of it.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;FONT size=+0&gt;"&lt;A  href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You  Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-3147339154025929949?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/3147339154025929949/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/waxman-markey.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/3147339154025929949'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/3147339154025929949'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/waxman-markey.html' title='Waxman-Markey'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-1848524827742893435</id><published>2009-05-26T23:08:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-26T23:14:24.489-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='authoritarianism'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='socialism'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='politics'/><title type='text'>Chicago Tribune cartoon - 1934</title><content type='html'>&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_567aVEoiH00/Shyu7zHcdrI/AAAAAAAAAJ8/faLsEdsX_-M/s1600-h/Chicago-Tribune-cartoon1934.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 325px; height: 400px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_567aVEoiH00/Shyu7zHcdrI/AAAAAAAAAJ8/faLsEdsX_-M/s400/Chicago-Tribune-cartoon1934.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5340335600511514290" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Doesn't this look a more than a little bit like what we're going through right now?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/a&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-1848524827742893435?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/1848524827742893435/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/chicago-tribune-cartoon-1934.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1848524827742893435'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1848524827742893435'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/chicago-tribune-cartoon-1934.html' title='Chicago Tribune cartoon - 1934'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_567aVEoiH00/Shyu7zHcdrI/AAAAAAAAAJ8/faLsEdsX_-M/s72-c/Chicago-Tribune-cartoon1934.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-8110559641702699984</id><published>2009-05-24T15:40:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-24T15:40:45.330-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Lest We Forget...</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;God of our fathers, known of old--&lt;BR&gt;Lord of our  far-flung battle line--&lt;BR&gt;Beneath whose awful hand we hold&lt;BR&gt;Dominion over  palm and pine--&lt;BR&gt;Lord God of Hosts, be with us yet,&lt;BR&gt;Lest we forget--lest we  forget!&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;The tumult and the shouting dies--&lt;BR&gt;The Captains  and the Kings depart--&lt;BR&gt;Still stands Thine ancient sacrifice,&lt;BR&gt;An humble and  a contrite heart.&lt;BR&gt;Lord God of Hosts, be with us yet,&lt;BR&gt;Lest we forget--lest  we forget!&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Far-called our navies melt away--&lt;BR&gt;On dune and  headland sinks the fire--&lt;BR&gt;Lo, all our pomp of yesterday&lt;BR&gt;Is one with  Nineveh and Tyre!&lt;BR&gt;Judge of the Nations, spare us yet,&lt;BR&gt;Lest we forget--lest  we forget!&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;If, drunk with sight of power, we loose&lt;BR&gt;Wild  tongues that have not Thee in awe--&lt;BR&gt;Such boastings as the Gentiles use,&lt;BR&gt;Or  lesser breeds without the Law--&lt;BR&gt;Lord God of Hosts, be with us yet,&lt;BR&gt;Lest we  forget--lest we forget!&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;For heathen heart that puts her trust&lt;BR&gt;In reeking  tube and iron shard--&lt;BR&gt;All valiant dust that builds on dust,&lt;BR&gt;And guarding  calls not Thee to guard.&lt;BR&gt;For frantic boast and foolish word,&lt;BR&gt;Thy Mercy on  Thy People, Lord!&lt;BR&gt;Amen.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;-- Rudyard Kipling&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-8110559641702699984?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/8110559641702699984/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/lest-we-forget.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/8110559641702699984'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/8110559641702699984'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/lest-we-forget.html' title='Lest We Forget...'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-2563365129970430346</id><published>2009-05-12T13:16:00.006-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-12T13:23:12.083-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='culture'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='principles'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='honesty'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='truth'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Chicago crooks'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='economy'/><title type='text'>Abraham Lincoln's Thoughts</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_567aVEoiH00/SgmvFVJ73sI/AAAAAAAAAJ0/Xme6sjjD63o/s1600-h/Lincoln-Truisms.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 309px; height: 400px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_567aVEoiH00/SgmvFVJ73sI/AAAAAAAAAJ0/Xme6sjjD63o/s400/Lincoln-Truisms.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5334987739710086850" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;Perhaps we should consider Lincoln's words in light of what the present administration is doing to our country.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-2563365129970430346?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/2563365129970430346/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/abraham-lincolns-thoughts.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2563365129970430346'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2563365129970430346'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/abraham-lincolns-thoughts.html' title='Abraham Lincoln&apos;s Thoughts'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_567aVEoiH00/SgmvFVJ73sI/AAAAAAAAAJ0/Xme6sjjD63o/s72-c/Lincoln-Truisms.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-1159896823909632745</id><published>2009-05-11T09:47:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-11T09:47:53.259-04:00</updated><title type='text'>From Whence doth the Liberal Issue?</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;A  href="http://townhall.com/columnists/BurtPrelutsky/2009/05/11/where_are_liberals_hatched?page=full&amp;amp;comments=true"&gt;Article  today at Townhall.com&lt;/A&gt;, by Bert Prelutsky, a former Liberal who lives in  California:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I used to be what I thought    was a liberal. If, at the time, anyone had asked me to explain myself, I would    have said that I opposed Jim Crow laws, that I believed workers were entitled    to make a decent wage and work in a safe environment, and that American    citizens shouldn't be discriminated against because of their race, religion or    national origin.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I quit being a liberal because    I didn't believe that members of particular minority groups deserved    advantages denied to others, that illegal aliens weren't entitled to anything    but a swift kick to the backside, that being a devout Christian didn't make    you a bad person, and that capitalism was a system that worked, while    socialism not only didn't work but most often turned into  tyranny.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I honestly don't know why    there are so many liberals today and I certainly can't imagine why they have    such a lousy agenda. I have come up with a theory. Here in California, roughly    30 years ago, because of budget cuts, a great many people were released from    insane asylums. They wound up living in the streets, which explains the large    number of homeless people, even though Democrats would have you believe that    those are normal people who simply lost their jobs along the way.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Even after the state became    more solvent, it became almost impossible to get these poor souls back into    institutions where they could be fed, clothed and given their meds, because    the ACLU lawyers fought for their inalienable right to starve, freeze and use    the sidewalks of your city as their combination bedroom, living room and    bathroom.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Inevitably, they also got to    vote. As a result, the likes of Barbara Boxer, Dianne Feinstein, Gray Davis,    Arnold Schwarzenegger, Antonio Villaraigosa, Gavin Newsom and Jerry Brown,    wound up winning all the major elections. I mean, the truth is, you'd have to    be crazy to vote for those people.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I have to suspect that a    similar scenario took place all over the country. How else to explain that    two-thirds of Americans actually believe that Barack Obama's policies will    save our economy? I'm not even a Christian, but I find it bizarre that people    who pooh-pooh the idea that Christ raised the dead or walked on water are    totally convinced that a guy who's tossing trillions of dollars into the air    is a financial miracle worker. Talk about blind faith!&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; It makes me wonder if these    same people, were they facing personal bankruptcy, would think that the answer    to their own financial difficulties would be to give their wife an American    Express card and drop her off at Tiffany's.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If liberals aren't simply    insane, they surely must be hypocrites. Why else would they insist that    spending eight years bashing President Bush and comparing him, Dick Cheney and    Donald Rumsfeld, to the Nazi High Command was patriotic, but merely    questioning President Obama's qualifications, judgment and policies makes one    a racist?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; How is it that when, between    2000 and 2006, when the GOP had control of the Oval Office, the House and the    Senate, on those rare occasions they didn't do the bidding of Ted Kennedy,    John Murtha or Charles Schumer, they were condemned as divisive? However, when    Obama and his left-wing cronies rushed through a trillion dollar stimulus    package and a pork-filled budget over Republican objections, nobody in their    crowd cried "Foul!" or insisted on reaching across the aisle for a group hug    and a few choruses of "Kumbaya"?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Before anyone bothers sending    an e-mail reminding me that three Republican senators voted with the Democrats    on the stimulus bill, I haven't forgotten. But, let's face it -- the two    ladies from Maine are merely the east coast version of Boxer and Feinstein. As    for Arlen Specter, I suspect that along the way, he'll switch to the    Extraterrestial Party if, as he inches closer to being a hundred years old, he    decides that's his best chance of winning an election.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I know that people such as    Sen. Specter and Sen. Jeffords would have us believe that they switched    parties because of their principles, but I would prefer it if they only said    such silly things in the hope of making me laugh. That's because I love to    laugh, but I hate being taken for a fool. I mean, really, Jim Jeffords wakes    up one day when he's 67 years old and Specter opens his eyes at the age of 79    and suddenly decide that the GOP isn't as conservative as they'd like, so the    solution is to link left arms with the likes of Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid,    Chris Dodd and Barney Frank?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Something else that makes me    wonder if, in a nicer, kinder world, liberals wouldn't be housed in a warm    place where they'd be kept safely away from sharp objects and voting booths,    is their notion of what constitutes torture. In my world, cutting off Daniel    Pearl's head, throwing Anne Frank in an oven or having to listen to Chris    Matthews, is torture. But by no means is it playing loud music, keeping people    awake, making them share space with a caterpillar or even dousing them with    water, in order to get them to cough up information that might prevent another    9/11 or keep American soldiers from being ambushed.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Only a liberal could confuse    actual torture with college hazing. I suspect there are members of    fraternities who could share more harrowing tales than the Islamics with their    Korans, their three squares and their personal prayer mats at    Gitmo.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Another difference that seems    to escape liberals is that it's torture when the only purpose is to cause    pain, not when it's done in order to pry important information from    terrorists.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; And, finally, when did    liberals decide that homosexuals get the final word when it comes to matters    of morals, values or anything else, for that matter?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; It's bad enough that any    number of self-righteous academics kept military recruiters off college    campuses, pretending that their objection stemmed from the army's don't    ask/don't tell policy, and not simply because left-wingers hate anything and    everything that smacks of patriotism.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; In much the same way, those on    the Left have led a crusade against the Boy Scouts of America because, so they    say, they oppose the policy of not allowing homosexuals to be Scout leaders    and take young boys into the woods on camping trips. Sensible people regard    that as a sensible policy. It's not to suggest that every gay man is a    pedophile, but simply recognizing that most pedophiles are gay men. Just as    every Muslim is not a terrorist, just about every terrorist these days is a    Muslim. So, why should parents take any unnecessary chances with their most    precious possessions just so homosexuals won't have their feelings    hurt?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Liberals don't really care    about homosexuals, by the way, unless they themselves happen to be gay. The    truth is liberals rarely serve in the military now that service is voluntary    and they don't usually let their kids join the Boy Scouts, not because they're    offended by the aforementioned policy, but because the group fosters    faith-based and patriotic ideals.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If you want a perfect example    of liberal hypocrisy, consider the recent beauty pageant when a repulsive    little freak who calls himself Perez Hilton (born Mario Lavenderia), who had    no business even being on stage at a competition involving beautiful women,    got to ask Miss California, Carrie Prejean, how she felt about same-sex    marriages. Her honest answer probably cost her the victory, while earning her    the respect of most fair and decent Americans.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; What I find so telling about    the incident was that in California, the reason that the same-sex marriage    measure was defeated on the November ballot was because 70% of blacks voted    that way. But the gays only demonstrated outside Catholic and Mormon churches    and businesses. Furthermore, I guarantee that if Miss Prejean had been black,    instead of a blue-eyed blonde, Mr. Hilton wouldn't have dared open his ugly    little yap.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; It's also worth noting that    President Obama gave the exact same answer to the exact same question during    the campaign, and yet the gays voted overwhelmingly for him. Which certainly    suggests that, thanks to the insane asylums being relatively empty these days,    honesty can cost you a tiara, but not the presidency.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;FONT&gt;"&lt;A  href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You  Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-1159896823909632745?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/1159896823909632745/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/from-whence-doth-liberal-issue.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1159896823909632745'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1159896823909632745'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/from-whence-doth-liberal-issue.html' title='From Whence doth the Liberal Issue?'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-6497674467573477886</id><published>2009-05-11T09:15:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-11T09:16:10.496-04:00</updated><title type='text'>"Empathy" versus Law, Part IV</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;In &lt;A  href="http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell050809.php3"&gt;his fourth column&lt;/A&gt;  in a series on activist juciciary, Thomas Sowell talks about the leftist, "Big  Government"&amp;nbsp;agenda being pushed by the current occupant of the Oval  Office:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; While President Barack Obama    has, in one sense, tipped his hand by saying that he wants judges with    "empathy" for certain groups, he has in a more fundamental sense concealed the    real goal - getting judges who will ratify an ever-expanding scope of the    power of the federal government and an ever-declining restraint by the    Constitution of the United States.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; This is consistent with    everything else that Obama has done in office and is consistent with his    decades-long track record of alliances with people who reject the fundamentals    of American society.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Judicial expansion of federal    power is not really new, even if the audacity with which that goal is being    pursued may be unique. For more than a century, believers in bigger government    have also been believers in having judges "interpret" the restraints of the    Constitution out of existence.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; They called this "a living    Constitution." But it has in fact been a dying Constitution, as its    restraining provisions have been interpreted to mean less and less, so that    the federal government can do more and more.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; For example, the Constitution    allows private property to be taken for "public use" - perhaps building a    reservoir or a highway - if "just compensation" was paid. But that power was    expanded by the Supreme Court in 2005 when it "interpreted" this to mean that    private property could be taken for a "public purpose," which could include    almost anything for which politicians could come up with the right    rhetoric.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; As for "just compensation,"    that is often about as just as "separate but equal" was equal. As for    "empathy" for the less fortunate, it is precisely lower income and minority    neighborhoods that are disproportionately bulldozed to make way for upscale    shopping and entertainment centers that will bring in more taxes for    politicians to spend to get themselves re-elected.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; This process of "interpreting"    the Constitution (or legislation) to mean pretty much whatever you want it to    mean, no matter how plainly the words say something else, has been called    judicial activism. But, as a result of widespread objections to this, that    problem has been solved by redefining "judicial activism" to mean something    different.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; By the new definition, a judge    who declares legislation that exceeds the authority of the legislature    unconstitutional is called a "judicial activist."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The verbal virtuosity is    breathtaking. With just a new meaning to an old phrase, reality is turned    upside down. Those who oppose letting government actions exceed the bounds of    the Constitution - justices like Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas - are now    called "judicial activists." It is a verbal coup.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Not only politicians like    Senator Patrick Leahy, but also law professors like Cass Sunstein and many in    the media, measure how much of a judicial activist a judge is by how many laws    that judge has declared unconstitutional. Professor Sunstein, incidentally, is    among those being mentioned as a possible nominee for a post on the Supreme    Court.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; When the Supreme Court in 1995    declared that carrying a gun near a school was not "interstate commerce,"    there was consternation and outrage in the liberal press because previous    decisions of the Supreme Court in years past had allowed Congress to legislate    on virtually anything it wanted to by saying that it was exercising its    authority to regulate interstate commerce.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; When the Supreme Court decided    by a narrow 5 to 4 vote that carrying a gun near a school was not interstate    commerce, it was saying something that most people would consider too obvious    for words. But it was considered outrageous that the Supreme Court recognized    the obvious and refused to rubberstamp the sophistry that allowed Congress to    pass laws dealing with things that the Constitution never authorized it to    deal with.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Incidentally, carrying a gun    near a school was something that states had the authority to deal with, and    the great majority of states had already banned it.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; What is at stake in Supreme    Court nominations is the power of the federal government. "Empathy" is just    camouflage, a soothing word for those who do not look beyond nice-sounding    rhetoric.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Dr. Sowell has an excellent way of communicating  the dangers posed&amp;nbsp;to the constitution by this current administration.&amp;nbsp;  It's a pity more people don't read and consider the things he's telling  us.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;FONT&gt;"&lt;A  href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You  Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-6497674467573477886?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/6497674467573477886/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/empathy-versus-law-part-iv.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6497674467573477886'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/6497674467573477886'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/empathy-versus-law-part-iv.html' title='&quot;Empathy&quot; versus Law, Part IV'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-7560094848704363298</id><published>2009-05-07T15:16:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-11T09:10:33.519-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='honesty'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='empathy'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Thomas Sowell'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='judicial activism'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Supreme Court'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Law'/><title type='text'>"Empathy" vs Law, Part III</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell050709.php3"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;Dr. Thomas Sowell&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;  continues his explanation of the requirements of Law - and those who would be  Judges:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;blockquote style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir="ltr"&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;   &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;There is a reason why the statue of Justice wears    a blindfold. There are things that courts are not supposed to see or recognize    when making their decisions-- the race you belong to, whether you are rich or    poor, and other personal things that could bias decisions by judges and    juries.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:Georgia;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;    &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;It is an ideal that a society strives for, even    if particular judges or juries fall short of that ideal. Now, however,    President Barack Obama has repudiated that ideal itself by saying that he    wants to appoint judges with "empathy" for particular groups.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:Georgia;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;    &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;This was not an isolated slip of the tongue.    Barack Obama said the same thing during last year's election campaign.    Moreover, it is completely consistent with his behavior and associations over    a period of years-- and inconsistent with fundamental principles of American    government and society.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:Georgia;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;   &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;Nor is this President Obama's only attempt to    remake American society. Barack Obama's vision of America is one in which a    President of the United States can fire the head of General Motors, tell banks    how to bank, control the medical system and take charge of all sorts of other    activities for which neither he nor other politicians have any expertise or    experience.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:Georgia;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;   &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;The Constitution of the United States gives no    president, nor the entire federal government, the authority to do such things.    But spending trillions of dollars to bail out all sorts of companies buys the    power to tell them how to operate.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:Georgia;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;   &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;Appointing judges to the federal courts--    including the Supreme Court-- who believe in expanding the powers of the    federal government to make arbitrary decisions, choosing who will be winners    and losers in the economy and in the society, is perfectly consistent with a    vision of the world where self-confident and self-righteous elites rule    according to their own notions, instead of merely governing under the    restraints of the Constitution.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;   &lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;If all this can be washed down with pious talk    about "empathy," so much the better for those who want to remake America. Now    that the Obama administration has a Congressional majority that is virtually    unstoppable, and a media that is wholly uncritical, the chances of preventing    the president from putting someone on the Supreme Court who shares his desire    to turn America into a different country are slim or none.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:Georgia;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;   &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;The only thing on the side of those who    understand this, and who oppose it, is time. Reshaping the Supreme Court    cannot be done overnight, the way Congress passed a vast spending bill in two    days.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:Georgia;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;   &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;Replacing Supreme Court justices is something    that can only be done one at a time and at unpredictable intervals. What this    means is that Senators who do not have enough votes to stop an Obama nominee    for the High Court from being confirmed nevertheless have an opportunity - and    a duty - to alert the public to the dangers of what is being  done.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:Georgia;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;   &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;This does not mean turning confirmation hearings    into a circus or a kangaroo court with mud-slinging at judicial nominees, the    way Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas were smeared. But it also does not mean    taking the path of least resistance by quietly voting for people like Ruth    Bader Ginsberg and Stephen Breyer, who treat the Constitution as a grant of    arbitrary power to themselves, rather than a restriction of power on the    government as a whole.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:Georgia;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;   &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;It is all too easy to say "a president has a    right to appoint the kind of people he wants on the Supreme Court." He does.    But that does not mean that those who don't have the votes to stop dangerous    nominees from being confirmed are obliged to vote for them or to stand    mute.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:Georgia;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;   &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;Since Justice David Souter is likely to be    replaced by another liberal, it is all too easy to say that it is no big deal.    But with all the indications already as to how the Obama administration is    trying to remake America on many fronts, the time to begin alerting the public    to the dangers is now.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-family:Georgia;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;   &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;Given the age and health of other Supreme Court    justices, more replacements are likely during Obama's time in the White House.    Time is an opportunity to mobilize public opinion and perhaps change the    composition of the Senate that confirms judicial nominees.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;   &lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;But time by itself does nothing. It is what we do    with time that matters.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;What Were You  Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-7560094848704363298?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/7560094848704363298/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/empathy-vs-law-part-iii.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7560094848704363298'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7560094848704363298'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/empathy-vs-law-part-iii.html' title='&quot;Empathy&quot; vs Law, Part III'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-5049599776014712789</id><published>2009-05-07T14:39:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-07T14:40:09.856-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Our National Heritage: In God We Trust</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;This one is a keeper, and very appropriate on this  National Day of Prayer.&amp;nbsp; I was thinking just yesterday of the sacrifices  made by so&amp;nbsp;many in our country's history, even to death, with the noble  goal of defending their country,&amp;nbsp;preserving the Union, and defending the  Constitution.&amp;nbsp; I thought also of the selfish aims and intentions of so many  others just last year, people who would prefer to believe the proven lies of  those who have no moral compass, who would pervert the clear message of God's  Holy Scripture and the Constitution of the United States of America, people who  have no higher goal than their own personal peace and affluence. I pray God will  never desert this small, faithful remnant that call upon His Name for the sake  of our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ.&amp;nbsp; May He help us in our time of need,  may He bring the needed change of heart to those who would pervert our civil  society, and may He draw to Himself all those He has chosen to Salvation and  Life Eternal.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;A  href="http://www.interviewwithgod.com/patriotic/highband.htm"&gt;http://www.interviewwithgod.com/patriotic/highband.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;God Bless,&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Ron Kohlin&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-5049599776014712789?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/5049599776014712789/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/our-national-heritage-in-god-we-trust.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5049599776014712789'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5049599776014712789'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/our-national-heritage-in-god-we-trust.html' title='Our National Heritage: In God We Trust'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-351251921995324662</id><published>2009-05-06T15:51:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-06T15:53:09.731-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Nancy Pelosi'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='corruption'/><title type='text'>That's Pelosi!</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 10px; white-space: pre; "&gt;&lt;object width="445" height="364"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/iNcYtpq8VsQ&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;rel=0&amp;amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;amp;border=1"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/iNcYtpq8VsQ&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;rel=0&amp;amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="445" height="364"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-351251921995324662?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/351251921995324662/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/thats-pelosi.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/351251921995324662'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/351251921995324662'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/thats-pelosi.html' title='That&apos;s Pelosi!'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-1056230390164546252</id><published>2009-05-06T13:07:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-06T13:07:59.812-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The End of Federalism</title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Morning Bell from &lt;A  href="http://blog.heritage.org/"&gt;the Heritage Foundation&lt;/A&gt; this  morning:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Addressing Congress on the State of the Union,  President Ronald Reagan told the American people in 1982:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir=ltr&gt;   &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Our citizens feel they've lost control of even    the most basic decisions made about the essential services of government, such    as schools, welfare, roads, and even garbage collection. And they're right. A    maze of interlocking jurisdictions and levels of government confronts average    citizens in trying to solve even the simplest of problems. They don't know    where to turn for answers, who to hold accountable, who to praise, who to    blame, who to vote for or against. The main reason for this is the    overpowering growth of Federal grants-in-aid programs during the past few    decades.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Reagan not only talked about reviving federalism  ... he did it. Under President Jimmy Carter the percentage of state expenditures  coming from federal funds rose to 35.4%. Reagan lowered that number to 24.9%.  Unfortunately, under President George H.W. Bush, President Bill Clinton, and  President George Bush that number shot up again; reaching 42.5% in 2005. But now  with President Barack Obama in power, wielding his $787 billion stimulus  package, state dependency on the federal government has reached a historic new  height. USA Today reports: "In a historic first, Uncle Sam has supplanted sales,  property and income taxes as the biggest source of revenue for state and local  governments."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;Contrary to what the USA Today goes on to suggest,  there is nothing temporary about the upsetting of the "traditional balance of  how states" and other localities pay for their operations. Since the last great  leftist project, the Great Society, the states have steadily become more and  more dependent on Washington, D.C. Only Reagan managed to reverse this  trend.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt; &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2 face=Arial&gt;&lt;FONT&gt;"&lt;A  href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;What Were You  Thinking&lt;/A&gt;?"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-1056230390164546252?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/1056230390164546252/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/end-of-federalism.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1056230390164546252'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1056230390164546252'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/end-of-federalism.html' title='The End of Federalism'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-309337036454030287</id><published>2009-05-06T10:00:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-06T10:17:57.253-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='racial quotas'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='empathy'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Thomas Sowell'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='judicial activism'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Supreme Court'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Law'/><title type='text'>"Empathy" versus Law, Part II</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;font-size:85%;"&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Dr. Sowell continues his discussion of the Supreme  Court with &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell050609.php3"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;today's  commentary&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; about Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;blockquote style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir="ltr"&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    The great Supreme Court    justice Oliver Wendell Holmes is not the kind of justice who would have been    appointed under President Barack Obama's criterion of "empathy" for certain    groups.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Like most people, Justice    Holmes had empathy for some and antipathy for others, but his votes on the    Supreme Court often went against those for whom he had empathy and for those    for whom he had antipathy. As Holmes himself put it: "I loathed most of the    things in favor of which I decided."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    After voting in favor of    Benjamin Gitlow in the 1925 case of Gitlow v. People of New York, Holmes said    in a letter to a friend that he had just voted for "the right of an ass to    drool about proletarian dictatorship." Similarly, in the case of Abrams v.    United States, Holmes' dissenting opinion in favor of the appellants    characterized the views of those appellants as "a creed which I believe to be    the creed of ignorance and immaturity."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    By the same token, Justice    Holmes did not let his sympathies with some people determine his votes on the    High Court. As a young man, Holmes had dropped out of Harvard to go fight in    the Civil War because he opposed slavery. In later years, he expressed his    dislike of the minstrel shows that were popular at the time "because they seem    to belittle the race."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    When there were outcries    against the prosecution of Sacco and Vanzetti in the 1920s, Holmes said in a    letter, "I cannot but ask myself why this so much greater interest in red than    black. A thousand-fold worse cases of negroes come up from time to time, but    the world does not worry over them."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Yet when two black attorneys    appeared before the Supreme Court, Holmes wrote in another letter to a friend    that he had to "write a decision against a very thorough and really well    expressed argument by two colored men"-- an argument "that even in intonation    was better than, I should say, the majority of white discourses that we    hear."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Holmes understood that a    Supreme Court justice was not there to favor some people or even to prescribe    what was best for society. He had a very clear sense of what the role of a    judge was-- and wasn't.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Justice Holmes saw his job to    be "to see that the game is played according to the rules whether I like them    or not."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    That was because the law    existed for the citizens, not for lawyers or judges, and the citizen had to    know what the rules were, in order to obey them.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    He said: "Men should know the    rules by which the game is played. Doubt as to the value of some of those    rules is no sufficient reason why they should not be followed by the courts."    Legislators existed to change the law.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    After a lunch with Judge    Learned Hand, as Holmes was departing in a carriage to return to work, Judge    Hand said to him: "Do justice, sir. Do justice."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Holmes had the carriage    stopped. "That is not my job," he said. "My job is to apply the    law."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Holmes wrote that he did not    "think it desirable that the judges should undertake to renovate the law." If    the law needed changing, that was what the democratic process was for. Indeed,    that was what the separation of powers in legislative, executive and judicial    branches by the Constitution of the United States was for.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    "The criterion of    constitutionality," he said, "is not whether we believe the law to be for the    public good." That was for other people to decide. For judges, he said: "When    we know what the source of the law has said it shall be, our authority is at    an end."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    One of Holmes' judicial    opinions ended: "I am not at liberty to consider the justice of the    Act."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Some have tried to depict    Justice Holmes as someone who saw no need for morality in the law. On the    contrary, he said: "The law is the witness and external deposit of our moral    life." But a society's need to put moral content into its laws did not mean    that it was the judge's job to second-guess the moral choices made by others    who were authorized to make such choices.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Justice Holmes understood the    difference between the rule of law and the rule of lawyers and    judges.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Consider the stature and character of Holmes as you  think about the judicial choice facing the current occupant of the Oval  Office.  Consider  what Obama has said about the sort of person  he will be choosing.  Consider these words by &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/White-House-puts-UAW-ahead-of-property-rights-44415057.html"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;columnist Michael Barone&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Obama's attitude toward the rule of law is apparent in the words he used to describe what he is looking for in a nominee to replace Justice David Souter. He wants "someone who understands justice is not just about some abstract legal theory," he said, but someone who has "empathy." In other words, judges should decide cases so that the right people win, not according to the rule of law.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Then ask yourself, "&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Was I  Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-309337036454030287?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/309337036454030287/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/empathy-versus-law-part-ii_06.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/309337036454030287'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/309337036454030287'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/empathy-versus-law-part-ii_06.html' title='&quot;Empathy&quot; versus Law, Part II'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-1604607334222896827</id><published>2009-05-05T08:47:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-06T07:40:41.102-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='racial quotas'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='empathy'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Thomas Sowell'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='judicial activism'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Supreme Court'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Law'/><title type='text'>"Empathy" versus Law</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;The words of Dr. Thomas Sowell have graced  this blog before.  In &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell050509.php3"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;today's column&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;,  he addresses the requirements for a nominee to the Supreme Court of the United  States of America.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;blockquote style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir="ltr"&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Justice David Souter's    retirement from the Supreme Court presents President Barack Obama with his    first opportunity to appoint someone to the High Court. People who are    speculating about whether the next nominee will be a woman, a Hispanic or    whatever, are missing the point.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    That we are discussing the    next Supreme Court justice in terms of group "representation" is a sign of how    far we have already strayed from the purpose of law and the weighty    responsibility of appointing someone to sit for life on the highest court in    the land.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    That President Obama has made    "empathy" with certain groups one of his criteria for choosing a Supreme Court    nominee is a dangerous sign of how much further the Supreme Court may be    pushed away from the rule of law and toward even more arbitrary judicial    edicts to advance the agenda of the left and set it in legal concrete, immune    from the democratic process.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Would you want to go into    court to appear before a judge with "empathy" for groups A, B and C, if you    were a member of groups X, Y or Z? Nothing could be further from the rule of    law. That would be bad news, even in a traffic court, much less in a court    that has the last word on your rights under the Constitution of the United    States.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Appoint enough Supreme Court    justices with "empathy" for particular groups and you would have, for all    practical purposes, repealed the 14th Amendment, which guarantees "equal    protection of the laws" for all Americans.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    We would have entered a    strange new world, where everybody is equal but some are more equal than    others. The very idea of the rule of law would become meaningless when it is    replaced by the empathies of judges.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Barack Obama solves this    contradiction, as he solves so many other problems, with rhetoric. If you    believe in the rule of law, he will say the words "rule of law." And if you    are willing to buy it, he will keep on selling it.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Those people who just accept    soothing words from politicians they like are gambling with the future of a    nation. If you were German, would you be in favor of a law "to relieve the    distress of the German people and nation"? That was the law that gave Hitler    dictatorial power.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    He was just another German    chancellor at the time. He was not elected on a platform of war, dictatorship    or genocide. He got the power to do those things because of a law "to relieve    the distress of the German people."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    When you buy words, you had    better know what you are buying.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    In the American system of    government, presidential term limits restrict how long any given resident of    the White House can damage this country directly. But that does not limit how    long, or how much, the people he appoints to the Supreme Court can continue to    damage this country, for decades after the president who appointed them is    long gone.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Justice John Paul Stevens    virtually destroyed the Constitution's restrictions on government officials'    ability to confiscate private property in his 2005 decision in the case of    "Kelo v. New London" - 30 years after President Ford appointed    him.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    The biggest danger in    appointing the wrong people to the Supreme Court is not just in how they might    vote on some particular issues - whether private property, abortion or    whatever. The biggest danger is that they will undermine or destroy the very    concept of the rule of law - what has been called "a government of laws and    not of men."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Under the American system of    government, this cannot be done overnight or perhaps even during the terms in    office of one president - but it can be done. And it can be done over time by    the appointees of just one president, if he gets enough    appointees.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Some people say that who    Barack Obama appoints to replace Justice Souter doesn't really matter, because    Souter is a liberal who will probably be replaced by another liberal. But, if    no one sounds the alarm now, we can end up with a series of appointees with    "empathy" - which is to say, with justices who think their job is to "relieve    the distress" of particular groups, rather than to uphold the Constitution of    the United States.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Good heavens, people.  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You  Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-1604607334222896827?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/1604607334222896827/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/empathy-versus-law.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1604607334222896827'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1604607334222896827'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/empathy-versus-law.html' title='&quot;Empathy&quot; versus Law'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-5603713427437291030</id><published>2009-05-05T00:11:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-05T00:14:28.775-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='hoax'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Global Warming'/><title type='text'>Threat or Hot Air?</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;For more than thirty years, Chuck Colson has  been working for prisoner rehabilitation and reform of the prison system in the  United States.  He has also been a keen observer of the spiritual state of  the country, and after having been involved as an insider in the political  system, has been able to make some observations in that arena.  On Monday  he shared &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.informz.net/pfm/archives/archive_774890.html"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;this  BreakPoint article&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; with his readers:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;blockquote style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir="ltr"&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Just recently, the    Environmental Protection Agency ruled that carbon dioxide and five other    greenhouse gases are "pollutants that threaten public health and welfare." The    "threat" comes from the effects of man-made global warming.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    This ruling is the first step    in regulating the very gas that makes life on Earth possible. If that sounds    odd to you, it should. A lot of what is going on here has little, if anything,    to do with public health.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    The EPA's "endangerment    finding" classified CO2 under the Clean Air Act as a pollutant. EPA    administrator Sheila Jackson said, "Greenhouse-gas pollution is a serious    problem now and for future generations."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    There are many scientists who    would disagree. The agency's findings came at a time when the science    surrounding man-made global warming is more hotly debated than    ever.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    For starters, there are good    reasons to doubt whether, in fact, the globe is getting warmer. The data, as    opposed to computer models, strongly suggests that the globe has been cooling    for the better part of a decade. This inconvenient fact may be why the    preferred expression has gone from "global warming" to "climate    change."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    But history teaches us that    climate is always changing. So the question becomes: What causes climate    change? Again, many leading climate scientists insist, with ample evidence to    back it up, that the warming that occurred during the 20th century resulted    from natural causes and cycles. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Finally there are those, like    the Danish researcher Bjorn Lomborg, who insist that even if human activity is    contributing to a warming trend, trying to regulate CO2 is the wrong approach.    Lomborg says that "cutting CO2 simply doesn't matter much for most of the    world's important issues." Lomborg says the goal should be "to do better for    people and the environment." Thus, we should emphasize developing technologies    that mitigate the harmful effects of rising temperatures and developing    alternative energy sources.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    While these are all good    points that are worthy of serious consideration, this issue isn't principally    about science and sound policy. It's about reinventing the way people,    especially Americans, live. The global warming crowd wants to change where we    live, what we drive, and even what we eat.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    The kind of coercion needed to    pull that off can only come about by using what Britain's Hadley Center,    itself a proponent of man-made global warming, calls "misleading . . .    apocalyptic rhetoric." Rhetoric such as Congressman Harry Waxman telling NPR    that the North Pole was in danger of evaporating.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Sadly, the biggest victims of    this misleading rhetoric will be the world's poor. As Lomborg points out,    "Carbon remains the only way for developing countries to work their way out of    poverty. . . . No green energy source is inexpensive enough to replace coal    now." And as I've said often on BreakPoint, from a Christian point of view,    morally sound approaches to the environment must consider the plight of the    poor.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Calling CO2, a part of the    natural ecosystem, a "threat" to public health brushes aside these concerns    and lets the would-be social engineers get to work - work that may create    serious problems now and for future generations.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; "&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;It is a shame that so few people are willing to  examine the motives of those who are pushing for such short-sighted public  policies.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You  Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-5603713427437291030?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/5603713427437291030/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/threat-or-hot-air.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5603713427437291030'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/5603713427437291030'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/threat-or-hot-air.html' title='Threat or Hot Air?'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-7833938823468373379</id><published>2009-05-03T22:25:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-03T22:31:25.834-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='corruption'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='spending'/><title type='text'>Stop Spending Our Future</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" white-space: pre; font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;object width="560" height="340"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yREOUxo6Qdc&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1"&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yREOUxo6Qdc&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" white-space: pre; font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="WIDOWS: 2; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; BORDER-COLLAPSE: separate; FONT: 10px Arial; WHITE-SPACE: pre; ORPHANS: 2; LETTER-SPACING: normal; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); WORD-SPACING: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0" class="Apple-style-span"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;Did you vote for Obama?  "&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;What Were You  Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-7833938823468373379?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/7833938823468373379/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/stop-spending-our-future.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7833938823468373379'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/7833938823468373379'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/stop-spending-our-future.html' title='Stop Spending Our Future'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-2100421049044948012</id><published>2009-05-02T16:51:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-07T15:24:34.237-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='authoritarianism'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Levin'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Schaeffer'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='culture wars'/><title type='text'>Authoritarian Government</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;font-size:85%;"&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;It seems to me that there are many aspects of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_war"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;the Culture Wars&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;, but the  conflict revolves around the key issue of what is Right and what is Wrong.   In that discussion, we find many areas of dispute, including but definitely not  limited to the following:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;blockquote style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir="ltr"&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Absolutes vs Relativism&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Religion vs    non-religion/secularism/pantheology&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Political Correctness vs Free Speech&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;A High view of Live vs Abortion on Demand&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Multi-Culturalism vs a blended, "Melting Pot"    society&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Feminism -- new roles for Women in our    postmodern society&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Homosexuality impinging on traditional    marriage&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Class consciousness -- hatred of "The    Rich"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Academic Terrorism -- Whatever happened to    scholarly discussion?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Freedom of Conscience -- will honest    men be forced to act against personal principle?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;These are significant issues, of great  importance in our day.  Will we as Christians stand by while  voices louder than ours present the other side, or will we stand up and make the  Biblical case for a Christian World View?  How can we be Salt and Light in  the world if we are unwilling to provide the savor and illumination the Bible  calls upon us for?  In his day, Francis Schaeffer did not shrink from  providing honest answers to honest questions, even when such answers may have  repelled some of the questioners.  He was in the forefront of those who  said that abortion was wrong.  He pointed out the logical conclusions and  the eventual result of acceptance of abortion, and today we see euthanasia  written into law.  He signed the Chicago Statement on Biblical  Inerrancy.  He pointed out the fallacy of going through life seeking only  "Personal Peace and Affluence."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Mark Levin, in his book &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Liberty-Tyranny-Conservative-Mark-Levin/dp/1416562850"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Liberty  and Tyranny: A Conservitave Manifesto&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;, makes the case that those who  envision an all-powerful state are leading us toward a government of "soft  dictatorship."  I commend his book to your attention, because many of the  principles of a conservative political movement are those that derive from  a Christian world view.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Then there's this quote:  "If we as Christians  do not speak out as authoritarian governments grow from within or come from  outside, eventually we or our children will be the enemy of society and the  state.  No truly authoritarian government can tolerate those who have a  real absolute by which to judge its arbitrary absolutes and who speak out and  act upon that absolute.  This was the issue with the early church in regard  to the Roman Empire, and though the specific issue will in all probability take  a different form than Caesar-worship, the basic issue of having an absolute by  which to judge the state and society will be the same.  Here is a statement  to memorize: to make no decision in regard to the growth of authoritarian  government is already a decision for it."  Sound familiar?  These are  the words of Francis A Schaeffer, on page 256 of his book &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Should-Decline-Western-Thought-Culture/dp/0891072926"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;How  Should We Then Live?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; (copyright 1983).  We would do well to  consider them carefully as we look at the society in which we find ourselves  living.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You  Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-2100421049044948012?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/2100421049044948012/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/authoritarian-government.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2100421049044948012'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2100421049044948012'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/authoritarian-government.html' title='Authoritarian Government'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-4562530907601115485</id><published>2009-05-02T11:22:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-03T16:00:12.937-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='judicial activism'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='physicians'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='conscience'/><title type='text'>Law by Elected Representation, or by Appointed Judges?</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Who will decide on the substance of laws enacted by  legislature?  Will it be the representative government that is elected of,  by, and for the people, or will it rather be appointed judges, sitting with  lifetime tenure, who decide what is, and what is not, a constitutional  law?  Will the basis of such decisions be the words of a timeless  Constitution, or the "feelings" and personal opinion of whatever judge sits and  rules upon it?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;These questions becomes significant with the  election of a president who has called for more activist judges.  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=96777"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Bob Unruh, writing  today in World Net Daily&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;, tells the story of one state's  experience.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;blockquote style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir="ltr"&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Physicians in Montana could be    facing "kill-on-demand" orders from patients who want to commit suicide if a    district court judge's opinion pending before the state Supreme Court is    affirmed.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    The case has attracted nominal    attention nationwide, but lawyers with the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.clsnet.org/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Christian Legal Service&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; have filed a    friend-of-the-court brief in the pending case because of what it would mean to    doctors within the state, as well as the precedent it would set.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    The concern is over the attack    on doctors' ethics and religious beliefs - as well as the Hippocratic oath -    that may be violated by a demand that they prescribe deadly chemicals or in    some other way assist in a person's death.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    M. Casey Mattox, a lawyer with    the CLS, told WND that states allowing a "right to die" across the country -    Oregon and Washington - include an opt-out provision for physicians with    ethical or religious opposition to participating in killing a    patient.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Montana's situation, created    late last year in &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=82928"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;a decision    from First District Court Judge Dorothy McCarter&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; in the Baxter et al. v.    Montana case, is different. There is no provision for a doctor to refuse such    "treatment" for a patient.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    In that case, Robert Baxter,    75, a retired truck driver from Billings who suffers from lymphocytic    leukemia, filed the lawsuit along with four physicians in the state's district    court system. They were aided in the case by the assisted suicide advocacy    group &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.compassionandchoices.org/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Compassion &amp;amp;    Choices&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;, formerly known as the Hemlock Society.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Baxter told the organization's    magazine that society already provides death when animals are    suffering.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    "I just feel if we can do it    for animals," Baxter said, "we can do it for human beings."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    The CLS, joined by the    Christian Medical Association, yesterday filed briefs asking the state Supreme    Court to protect the conscience rights of healthcare    professionals.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    The groups, representing more    than 18,000 Christian medical and legal professions, are urging the court to    reverse the district court's decision and recognize a right not to participate    in assisted suicide.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    "The trial court's decision to    create a constitutional right to 'obtain assistance from a medical care    provider in the form of obtaining a prescription for lethal drugs' threatens    the rights of healthcare professionals and institutions that hold sincere    ethical, moral, and religious objections to participating in the intentional    killing of their patients," Mattox said.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    "Medical professionals should    not be coerced to violate the Hippocratic Oath in order to practice in    Montana," he said.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    If a "right to die" is to be    recognized, it should be developed from the people through the legislative    process, not imposed by a single judge, the brief also argues.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    The district decision, the    groups also point out,  would seriously undermine the relationship    between doctors and patients. Patients could be uncomfortable knowing their    doctor had provided a lethal dose to another patient, and doctors would have    concerns about such demands from patients.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    "At a time when states are    experiencing a healthcare shortage, making Montana the only state in the union    to coerce professionals to assist in suicides could jeopardize the state's    healthcare system," Mattox said.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    He told WND that the effort    clearly is part of a nationwide agenda to impose and mandate ethical standards    on Americans. Similar are the Obama administration's suggestions that    pharmacists may not have the right to refuse to dispense abortion-inducing    medications, and doctors may not have a conscience right to refuse to do    abortions, he said.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    "I don't know where it's    coming from, but there is certainly a push from government to tell people to    set aside religious or ethical qualms and to abide by whatever the government    tells you is appropriate," he said.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Mattox said the state still    has several weeks to file its briefs in the Montana case, and then there will    be further arguments on behalf of requiring doctors to provide terminal    treatment.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    "A mentally competent,    terminally ill Montanan should have the right to choose a peaceful death, when    confronted by death," Kathryn Tucker, Compassion &amp;amp; Choices director of    legal affairs, told KTVQ-TV, Billings.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    But Montana Assistant Attorney    General Anthony Johnston disagrees.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Johnston told the television    station, "The laws governing the medical profession say the medical profession    is to heal, not to kill."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Is this what we've become as a country?  Am I  the only one who remembers the recent case in Oregon where a person who couldn't  afford life-saving treatment was told by the state that they would not help her  get such treatment, but that they would pay for a physician-assisted  suicide?  Check that organization that purports to be helping the dying  truck driver; their mantra of "freedom to choose" sounds very like the "freedom  of choice" touted by the pro-abortion lobby in our country. The only choice they  promote or offer is death.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You  Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-4562530907601115485?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/4562530907601115485/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/law-by-elected-representation-or-by.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/4562530907601115485'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/4562530907601115485'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/law-by-elected-representation-or-by.html' title='Law by Elected Representation, or by Appointed Judges?'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-1324292101003435443</id><published>2009-05-01T08:19:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-03T16:02:20.588-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='character'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='torture'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='abortion'/><title type='text'>Abortion and/or Torture</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Meredith Turney writes &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://townhall.com/Columnists/MeredithTurney/2009/04/30/obama%E2%80%99s_tortured_history?page=full&amp;amp;comments=true"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Thursday at  Townhall.com&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;blockquote style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir="ltr"&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    President Obama took the    occasion of his 100th day in office to publicly denounce the practice of    interrogative waterboarding as torture. During his primetime press conference,    the President justified his administration's ban on "enhanced interrogation    techniques" by citing Winston Churchill's refusal to engage in torture during    World War II: "Churchill understood, you start taking short-cuts, over time,    that corrodes what's -- what's best in a people. It corrodes the character of    a country."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    The "character of a country" -    specifically America - is an issue every president grapples with. On the world    stage, character - the ability to trust another nation's integrity - is    critical. A country with inconsistent morals is a nation whose character    cannot be trusted. Under the Obama Administration, America is perilously close    to losing our moral integrity regarding basic human rights, especially the    right to life.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Obama has taken a seemingly    unequivocal moral stand in favor of human rights by banning waterboarding,    which he considers a form of torture. But juxtapose his moral outrage over    torture with his nomination of Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius to lead the    Health and Human Services Department.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    During her twenty-plus years    as an elected official in Kansas, Sebelius has forged strong ties to infamous    abortionist George Tiller. For $5,000, Tiller will perform any abortion, for    any reason - including late-term abortions. The horror stories that have    emerged from Tiller's clinic describe callous acts of aborting    almost-full-term children. At this point in a pregnancy, these children most    certainly feel the pain and torture of chemical injections, cutting, ripping    and stabbing used in the abortion process.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    In May 2007, Bill O'Reilly    directed the nation's attention to Tiller's Wichita "death mill" when he    exposed Sebelius' veto of a bill that would have required Tiller to provide a    specific medical reason for the late-term abortions he performed on viable    fetuses. O'Reilly also brought to light the thousands of dollars Tiller had    donated to Sebelius' various campaigns and related political action    committees. "Now America is a great country, but this kind of barbaric display    in Kansas diminishes our entire nation," stated O'Reilly. Indeed, the way we    treat innocent life says just as much about our moral character as how we    interrogate terrorists.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Legislative attempts to end    the brutality perpetrated by Tiller and his ilk have been repeatedly thwarted    by Governor Sebelius. In fact, just prior to her Senate confirmation, Sebelius    vetoed legislation in Kansas that would have provided greater oversight of    late-term abortions such as those performed by Tiller. Refusing to hold    accountable those with young life in their hands is - in the words of    President Obama - "taking short-cuts" that corrode "what's best in a    people."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    It is the height of hypocrisy    to ban interrogation techniques on militant enemies of innocent life while    refusing to ensure innocent life isn't carelessly discarded by ruthless    abortionists.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    A few moments after President    Obama was asked about the torture issue at his press conference, another    reporter inquired about the controversy surrounding his commencement address    at the staunchly pro-life University of Notre Dame. Now in a much higher pay    grade than when he was last asked about his position on abortion, the reporter    asked whether the president still intended to sign the Freedom of Choice Act,    which would effectively remove all restrictions on abortion nationwide. Once    again, President Obama hemmed and hawed, rambling on about what a difficult    decision abortion is for women.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    As a state legislator in    Illinois, Obama opposed the Illinois Born Alive Infants Protection Act - a    legislative response to botched late-term abortions where babies were left to    die by starvation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    The President wants to appear    unequivocal about his "moral" decision to ban torture because he considers it    inhumane. But his equivocal response to the issue of abortion, and his votes    against banning the barbaric partial-birth abortion - which constitutes true    torture by any reasonable standard - reveal an inconsistency at    best.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Congressional Democrats have    been quick to call for investigations of and possible criminal prosecution for    "harsh interrogations" of terrorists. But many of these same politicians have    remained mute on Sebelius' connection to a notorious abortionist engaged in    abominable abortion practices.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    As the President explained the    torture ban during his recent press conference, he observed, "In some cases,    it may be harder, but part of what makes us, I think, still a beacon to the    world is that we are willing to hold true to our ideals even when it's hard,    not just when it's easy."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Perhaps we walk a thin line in    determining the definition of torture and its use in national security, but    when it comes to preventing the needless pain and suffering of children,    America should hold true to our ideal of protecting all innocent    life.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;It is indeed a sad day for our country when the  elected government feels more compassion for those who would destroy America  than for the unborn babies in our midst.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You  Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?" &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-1324292101003435443?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/1324292101003435443/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/abortion-andor-torture.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1324292101003435443'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1324292101003435443'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/05/abortion-andor-torture.html' title='Abortion and/or Torture'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-2964198245428602285</id><published>2009-04-30T10:56:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-03T16:09:01.212-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='jobs saved'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='accountability'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='spending'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='job loss'/><title type='text'>The Question that Didn't Get Asked</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;From The Heritage Foundation today:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;While pressing Obama on a variety of national  security questions, the White House press corps failed to ask: "Mr. President,  if your administration is already claiming credit for jobs created in this  economy, when can the American people start holding you accountable for all the  jobs lost?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Obama's desire to escape all accountability for his  economic policies was also on display earlier in the day when he told a town  hall in Missouri: "We inherited a $1.3 trillion deficit. That wasn't me." Oh  really? The Associated Press fact checked Obama's claim and  reports:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;blockquote style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir="ltr"&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;Congress controls the purse strings, not the president, and it was    under Democratic control for Obama's last two years as Illinois senator. Obama    supported the emergency bailout package in President George W. Bush's final    months - a package Democratic leaders wanted to make bigger.&lt;br /&gt;...&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;He's persuaded Congress to expand children's health insurance, education    spending, health information technology and more. He's moving ahead on a    variety of big-ticket items on health care, the environment, energy and    transportation that, if achieved, will be more enduring than bank bailouts and    aid for homeowners.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimated his    policy proposals would add a net $428 billion to the deficit over four years,    even accounting for his spending reduction goals. Now, the deficit is nearly    quadrupling to $1.75 trillion.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;The cost of Obama's massive spending explosion is about to hit home. The  Treasury Department announced yesterday that it is going to step up the issuing  of 30-year bonds to cover the hundreds of billions of dollars the Obama  administration is spending on bailouts and stimulus. A special advisory  committee to the Treasury then warned, "Treasuries will probably not receive the  same favorable demand treatment from either source over the coming quarters."  Translation: foreign and domestic investors are going to demand significantly  higher interest rates in exchange for buying the avalanche of new bonds.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Higher interest rates will strangle our economic recovery. Congress and the  President should do the opposite of what they apparently intend: They should cut  taxes on productive activities, not increase them. They should cut spending, not  increase it. And rather than increase government spending with new entitlements  like a government-run health plan, they should reduce future entitlement  benefits to give credit markets some confidence that U.S. policymakers have not  entirely abandoned fiscal discipline.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You  Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-2964198245428602285?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/2964198245428602285/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/04/question-that-didnt-get-asked.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2964198245428602285'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/2964198245428602285'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/04/question-that-didnt-get-asked.html' title='The Question that Didn&apos;t Get Asked'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-1997536644940327931</id><published>2009-04-30T10:42:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-03T16:06:37.097-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fairness doctrine'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='freedom of speech'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Thomas'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='mainstream media'/><title type='text'>The ANTI-'Fairness Doctrine'</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;The First Amendment to the Constitution of the  United States of America, the very first entry in our Bill of Rights passed on  March 4, 1789, reads as follows: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;''Congress shall make no  law&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free  exercise thereof; or &lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;abridging the freedom of speech&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;, or of the  press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the  Government for a redress of grievances." [emphasis mine]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;The current congress has no problem with most  of the mainstream press, and the three major television networks; for some  reason they all seem to have the same political biases and support all the  socialist programs that are being foisted on what is, for the most part, a  politically uneducated public.  As long as the mainstream media pushes the  leftist agenda, and continues their fawning love affair with the current  occupant of the Oval Office, they are safe from the scorn of  Democrats.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;But these leftists, in Congress and in the  mainstream media, cannot stand to have their policies and opinions -- their  agenda -- held up to the light of day by those who oppose them or who support an  alternate view.  They are not content to reply and rebut the opposition;  they rather do all they can to demonize people who hold views other than their  own(see &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/02/typical-democrat-voter.html"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;this  posting of February 27&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;, and especially &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123336391229335459.html?mod=djemEditorialPage"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;this  article from January 31&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;Many people have held forth on the possibility that  this congress will reprise, and the president sign, a new incarnation of the old  "Fairness Doctrine" to provide direction to use of the public  airwaves  Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid would have us believe that it will  provide a more fair, balanced expression of opinion.  Others have suggested  that it will rather reduce the radio spectrum to a bland sameness that is less  informative and more irrelavent to public discourse.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;But few of those who have opined on the subject  carry as much weight as does a member of the Supreme Court.  Justice  Clarence Thomas, a man who knows the depths of hatred from the political left  better than most, has shared his ideas, and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=96594"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;a column on World  Net Daily&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; today brings them to the public.  The Fairness Doctrine is,  says Justice Thomas, a Deep Intrusion into the rights of  broadcasters:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;blockquote style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir="ltr"&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;For the first time, a U.S. Supreme Court justice    is offering some legal insight about the so-called Fairness Doctrine,    suggesting the off-the-books policy could be declared unconstitutional if it's    revived and brought before the bench.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;In written discussion on yesterday's ruling    cracking down on indecent language on television, Justice Clarence Thomas    called the policy "problematic" and a "deep intrusion into the First Amendment    rights of broadcasters."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;The doctrine requiring broadcasters to air    opposing viewpoints on controversial issues was brought to an end in the 1980s    under the direction of President Ronald Reagan's Federal Communications    Commission.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;There has been widespread fear, though, the    policy could be resurrected during the term of President Barack    Obama.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; "&gt;The Pacific Justice Institute, a California-based    legal group specializing in the defense of religious freedom  and other    civil liberties, is calling the remarks by Thomas "very    significant."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;"To my knowledge, this is the first time a    sitting Supreme Court justice has weighed in on this issue," Matt McReynolds,    a PJI staff attorney, told WND.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;"It could potentially take a lot of steam out of    the movement from those who want to bring back the Fairness Doctrine. It also    provides a lot of ammo to those who have been saying it's unconstitutional.    Now we have some validation from a member of the court."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;Thomas is questioning the viability of Supreme    Court precedents dating back to the 1960s, long before the explosion of media    sources beyond radio airwaves.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;"The text of the First Amendment makes no    distinctions among print, broadcast, and cable media, but we have done so,"    Thomas noted.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;"It is certainly true that broadcast frequencies    are scarce but it is unclear why that fact justifies content regulation of    broadcasting in a way that would be intolerable if applied to the editorial    process of the print media."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;He also noticed "the number of over-the-air    broadcast stations grew from 7,411 in 1969 ... to 15,273 by the end of    2004."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;If Congress and the president bring the doctrine    back to life, there is no doubt lawsuits will fly.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;"We are prepared to take legal action should it    be reinstated," said Brad Dacus, president of PJI. "Justice Thomas' opinion is    very encouraging to everyone who believes in free speech and government    non-interference with public debate."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;Meanwhile, as WND is also reporting today, the    leader of a newly formed public awareness campaign to alert U.S. citizens    about an effort to stifle free speech says he expects local "boards" will be    assembled within 90 days to begin censoring talk radio, a move that will come    as an "Arctic blast" against the expression of opinion in the United    States.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;"I think the FCC is on the cusp of enacting    regulations that would fundamentally alter the traditional American assumption    that we have the right to share and debate political opinions," said talk-show    host Roger Hedgecock, whose new initiative is called "Don't Touch My    Dial."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;"The assault on the First Amendment that is being    planned by the government and the extremist Left is not limited to their    desire to silence conservative talk radio," Hedgecock said.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style=" ;font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;"Newspapers and television are not immune to the    anti-First Amendment efforts that are at work here. In addition, the Internet    is also a target for receiving the restrictive aspects of the so-called    'Fairness Doctrine.'"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;This assault by the left on what is one of the  basic tenets of the Constitution is unconscionable, and should be opposed by  Thinking People everywhere.  If only the government has the right to  propogate ideas, what happens to discussion?  Let me suggest that those who  oppose discussion of any view other than their own, do not have a view that can  stand scrutiny.  We should be very, very careful.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;What Were You  Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-1997536644940327931?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/1997536644940327931/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/04/anti-fairness-doctrine.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1997536644940327931'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1997536644940327931'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/04/anti-fairness-doctrine.html' title='The ANTI-&apos;Fairness Doctrine&apos;'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-1177454855174706939</id><published>2009-04-28T10:13:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-03T16:12:07.969-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='terrorism'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='secrets'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='national security'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Porter Goss'/><title type='text'>Security Before Politics</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;This article was written by Porter J. Goss, and  published on Saturday, April 25, 2009 in the Washington Post  newspaper.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;blockquote style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir="ltr"&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Since leaving my post as CIA    director almost three years ago, I have remained largely silent on the public    stage. I am speaking out now because I feel our government has crossed the red    line between properly protecting our national security and trying to gain    partisan political advantage. We can't have a secret intelligence service if    we keep giving away all the secrets. Americans have to decide now.    &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    A disturbing epidemic of    amnesia seems to be plaguing my former colleagues on Capitol Hill. After the    Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, members of the committees charged with overseeing our    nation's intelligence services had no higher priority than stopping al-Qaida.    In the fall of 2002, while I was chairman of the House intelligence committee,    senior members of Congress were briefed on the CIA's "&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.defenselink.mil/pdf/thehighvaluedetaineeprogram2.pdf"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;High    Value Terrorist Program&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;," including the development of "enhanced    interrogation techniques" and what those techniques were. This was not a    onetime briefing but an ongoing subject with lots of back and forth between    those members and the briefers. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Today, I am slack jawed to    read that members claim to have not understood that the techniques on which    they were briefed were to actually be employed; or that specific techniques    such as "waterboarding" were never mentioned. It must be hard for most    Americans of common sense to imagine how a member of Congress can forget being    told about the interrogations of Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed. In    that case, though, perhaps it is not amnesia but political expedience.    &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Let me be clear. It is my    recollection that: &lt;br /&gt;-- The chairs and the ranking minority members of    the House and Senate intelligence committees, known as the Gang of Four, were    briefed that the CIA was holding and interrogating high value terrorists.   &lt;br /&gt;-- We understood what the CIA was doing.&lt;br /&gt;-- We gave the CIA our    bipartisan support.&lt;br /&gt;-- We gave the CIA funding to carry out its    activities.&lt;br /&gt;-- On a bipartisan basis, we asked if the CIA needed more    support from Congress to carry out its mission against al-Qaida. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; "&gt;I do not recall a single objection from my    colleagues. They did not vote to stop authorizing CIA funding. And for those    who now reveal filed "memorandums for the record" suggesting concern, real    concern should have been expressed immediately to the committee chairs, the    briefers, the House speaker or minority leader, the CIA director or the    president's national security adviser and not quietly filed away in case the    day came when the political winds shifted. And shifted they have.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; "&gt;Circuses are not new in Washington, and I can see    preparations being made for tents from the Capitol straight down Pennsylvania    Avenue. The CIA has been pulled into the center ring before. The result    this  time will be the same: a hollowed out service of diminished    capabilities. After Sept. 11, the general outcry was, "Why don't we have    better overseas capabilities?" I fear that in the years to come this refrain    will be heard again: once a threat or God forbid, another successful attack    captures our attention and sends the pendulum swinging back. There is only one    person who can shut down this dangerous show: President Obama.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; "&gt;Unfortunately, much of the damage to our    capabilities has already been done. It is certainly not trust that is fostered    when intelligence officers are told one day "I have your back" only to learn a    day later that a knife is being held to it. After the events of this week,    morale at the CIA has been shaken to its foundation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; "&gt;We must not forget: Our intelligence allies    overseas view our inability to maintain secrecy as a reason to question our    worthiness as a partner. These allies have been vital in almost every capture    of a terrorist.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; "&gt;The suggestion that we are safer now because    information about interrogation techniques is in the public domain conjures up    images of unicorns and fairy dust. We have given our enemy invaluable    information about the rules by which we operate. The terrorists captured by    the CIA perfected the act of beheading innocents using dull knives. Khalid    Sheik Mohammed boasted of the tactic of placing explosives high enough in a    building to ensure that innocents trapped above would die if they tried to    escape through windows. There is simply no comparison between our    professionalism and their brutality.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; "&gt;Our enemies do not subscribe to the rules of the    Marquis of Queensbury. "Name, rank and serial number" does not apply to    nonstate actors but is, regrettably, the only question this administration    wants us to ask. Instead of taking risks, our intelligence officers will soon    resort to wordsmithing cables to headquarters while opportunities to    neutralize brutal radicals are lost.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; "&gt;The days of fortress America are gone. We are the    world's superpower. We can sit on our hands or we can become engaged to    improve global human conditions. The bottom line is that we cannot succeed    unless we have good intelligence. Trading security for partisan political    popularity will ensure that our secrets are not secret and that our    intelligence is destined to fail us.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; &lt;span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; font-style: italic; "&gt;The writer, a Republican, was director of the    CIA from September 2004 to May 2006 and was chairman of the House Permanent    Select Committee on Intelligence from 1997 to 2004.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Read a &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.defenselink.mil/pdf/thehighvaluedetaineeprogram2.pdf"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Summary  of the High Value Terrorist Detainee Program&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;  It probably comes as no great surprise that congressional Democrats and their  willing accomplices in the mainstream media are again telling outright  falsehoods to their constituency.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;What Were You Thinking&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6174662304468160045-1177454855174706939?l=thenewlosers.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/feeds/1177454855174706939/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/04/security-before-politics.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1177454855174706939'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6174662304468160045/posts/default/1177454855174706939'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://thenewlosers.blogspot.com/2009/04/security-before-politics.html' title='Security Before Politics'/><author><name>Ron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04653978898003889325</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://kohlin.com/common/2003-07-08_034-450_onSignalMtn.jpg'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6174662304468160045.post-4398569614926678302</id><published>2009-04-28T09:25:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-05-03T16:15:13.984-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='first amendment'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fairness doctrine'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='freedom of speech'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Cass Sunstein'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='internet'/><title type='text'>Internet Fairness Doctrine?</title><content type='html'>&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;One would think that Attorneys at Law, people who  have had legal training and are licensed to practice in these fifty states (not  57 as the current occupant of the Oval Office once said), would have a firm  grasp of the intention of the Framers of the Constitution when they drafted the  First Amendment.  Yet at the same time as they are contemplating a renewal  of the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" for the public airways, aimed at shutting  down any dissenting opinion on talk radio, the current administration in  Washington is looking at doing the same thing to those of us who offer an  opinion on the internet.  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=96301"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;World  Net Daily&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt; reports this morning:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;blockquote style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" dir="ltr"&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;WASHINGTON -- Barack Obama's nominee for    "regulatory czar" has advocated a "Fairness Doctrine" for the Internet that    would require opposing opinions be linked and also has suggested angry e-mails    should be prevented from being sent by technology that would require a 24-hour    cooling off period.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    The revelations about Cass    Sunstein, Obama's friend from the University of Chicago Law School and nominee    to head the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, come in    a new book by Brad O'Leary, "Shut Up, America! The End of Free Speech." OIRA    will oversee regulation throughout the U.S. government.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Sunstein also has argued in    his prolific literary works that the Internet is anti-democratic because of    the way users can filter out information of their own choosing.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    "A system of limitless    individual choices, with respect to communications, is not necessarily in the    interest of citizenship and self-government," he wrote. "Democratic efforts to    reduce the resulting problems ought not be rejected in freedom's    name."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Sunstein first proposed the    notion of imposing mandatory "electronic sidewalks" for the Net. These    "sidewalks" would display links to opposing viewpoints. Adam Thierer, senior    fellow and director of the Center for Digital Media Freedom at the Progress    and Freedom Center, has characterized the proposal as "The Fairness Doctrine    for the Internet."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;"Apparently in Sunstein's world, people have many    rights, but one of them, it seems, is not the right to be left alone or seek    out the opinions one desires," Thierer wrote.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    Later, Sunstein rethought his    proposal, explaining that it would be "too difficult to regulate [the    Internet] in a way that would respond to those concerns." He also acknowledged    that it was "almost certainly unconstitutional."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;Perhaps Sunstein's most novel idea regarding the Internet was his    proposal, in his book "Nudge," written with Richard Thaler, for a "Civility    Check" for e-mails and other online communications.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;   &lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"&gt;    "The modern world suffers from    insufficient civility," they wrote. "Every hour of every day, people send    angry e-mails they soon regret, cursing people they barely know (or even    worse, their friends and loved ones). A few of us have learned a simple rule:    don't send an angry e-mail in the heat of the moment. File it, and wait a day    before you send it. (In fact, the next day you may have calmed down so much    that you
